1D4@RG

[yakim_peled1]

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

<p>

<p dir="ltr">A bird photographer agrees that the D3s has better AF but disagrees that the 1D4 is not trustworthy and dependable enough.

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

 

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

</p>

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

<a href="http://photofocus.com/2010/02/18/a-response-to-rob-galbraiths-canon-autofocus-article/">http://photofocus.com/2010/02/18/a-response-to-rob-galbraiths-canon-autofocus-article/</a>

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

 

<p dir="ltr">Happy shooting,</p>

<p dir="ltr">Yakim.</p>

 

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

 

<p dir="ltr"> </p>

</p>

 

[scott_ferris]

<p>Marc,</p>

<p>Depends on your lens use. If you are used to a 1.3 crop and 16mp are enough for your print size and detail requirements then don't see why it wouldn't work for you.</p>

<p>If you use ultrawides or print very big or very detailed images then the 1Ds MkIII would make more sense and be a good compliment to a 1.3 crop camera. For outright detail or larger print sizes more mp on a larger sensor will always beat a smaller sensor with less mp. Indeed if you don't need video or the high fps the 1Ds MkIII is a better general photography tool than the 1D MkIV.</p>