Jump to content

Best film speed for old lenses


Recommended Posts

<p>What do y'all think would be the best film speed for older Zeiss lenses. I've got some that go to 3.5 and one or two that goes to 2.8. Most of the shutters top out at 400 or 500 but a few top out at 250. I've always use 100 but I've read lately that going up to 400 would not cause any problems. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>400 ISO film should not be a problem. It is only 2 stops faster then 100 ISO film. So either increase your shutter speed by 2 steps or close down the aperture by 2 steps (or 1 step each ;) ) when compared to the settings you use for certain light situations.<br>

You might get in trouble on very bright days where you might not be able to set the shutter fast enough or close down the aperture far enough.<br>

I've used 400 ISO films without trouble in 1920s box cameras, with only 1 shutter speed and 3 f/stops.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I generally prefer an ISO 400 b&w film for my older cameras including the Agfa Isolette folder. If I encounter conditions where the available light is too bright for the limited shutter speed range I just downrate the film to 200 or so and give it appropriately less development. And if needed I'll push to 1200-1600 in Diafine. With only 12 exposures it's easy to avoid running into limitations.</p>

<p>Pretty much the same with any of my leaf shutter cameras with f/2.8 or f/3.5 maximum apertures and shutter speeds that top out at 1/500th. An ISO 400 b&w film works pretty well all around.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Like Rick and Lex, I usually use ISO 400 Tri-X or color-negative film these days.</p>

<p>However, on a couple of occasions shooting with older cameras that only went to f/16 or had low top shutter speeds, this turned out to be too "hot". I've got a backlog of films to shoot right now, but I have got some Ektar 100 in the refrigerator of which I am expecting much, judging by posts I've seen here.</p>

<p>I will be shooting some more Nova film (née ORWO, yes!) ISO 125, and I do like Plus-X a lot. I've also got "Lucky" and some Ilford Plus..... One of the hard parts is choosing what to shoot them in.</p>

<p>Miss old Panatomic-X, though (still actually made, but not for consumers, as KODAK PANATOMIC-X AERECON II Film 3412)</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/10159311-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="989" /><br>

I have a little trouble with Velvia 50 in low light. Once, I had to keep the shutter pressed by hand and count out the seconds. Happily, I have a really stable tripod. Here's Velvia 50 through an Agfa Billy Record II f3.5 lens at f/22 for 8 seconds (one-one-thousand, etc.), shutter depressed by hand.<br>

In summary, dang ASA 50 can be tough to work with.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I mostly use ISO 400 B/W with a yellow filter (X2) (giving me an effective ISO of 200). That keeps my shutter speed around 100 - 250 and the f-stop around 8 - 11, on overcast days shutter 50 - 100, f4,5ish to 8 and a steady hand.</p>

<p>For my Zeiss lenses (Novar and Tessar) f8 - 11 seems to be the sweet spot. All my Zeiss MF folders and Ikoflex have a red dot at f10. My Contina 524/24 (35mm) has the red dot at f8. That appears to be the sweet spot according to Zeiss.</p>

<p>On really bright days, dessert or snow, I've found that I often have to put on an orange filter (X5) to keep the f stop around f8 - 11 (effective ISO of around 80) and not go beyond shutter 250 (most of my old Zeiss don't have a faster speed than that anyways). Or swtich to ISO 100 film.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...