richvanwart Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 <p>Hi Emma -- I just posted a "Blue Moon" photo, made with a D300 and the 70-300 VR G lens on the "Nikon Wednesday pic" forum, details with the posting. Check it out, if you like. It's a pretty nice lens, quite versatile, very useful as you've been hearing in this thread. Happy trails on your trip!</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightypir Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p>Another vote for the VR. I upgraded from the orignal G version and the difference was like night and day. And one cannot underscore the flexibility that the VR system provides enough!!! </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wouter Willemse Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p>The 70-300VR. Not the 70-300G, not the 70-300ED (not John, it is not better, and not even close). It's not the VR making the difference, but the fact that this is a completely new much improved optical design.</p> <p>But are you sure you need a lens this long for the trip? If you want to take wild-life pictures, obviously yes, but for most other things, a shorter lens can be nicer (i.e. Tokina 50-135, though that weighs quite a bit).<br> I read in the other thread you will get a 35 f/1.8 (good choice), but what other lens will you bring to cover the wider angles? What kind of photos do you expect to take most? A telezoom to me does not seem the most likely companion on a trip like yours (which, btw, sounds awesome - envy it!).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago_cerovsek1 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p><a href="http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/250-nikkor-af-s-70-300mm-f45-56-g-if-ed-vr-review--test-report">http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/250-nikkor-af-s-70-300mm-f45-56-g-if-ed-vr-review--test-report</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stan_schurman1 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p>From everything I've read, the VR is the way to go. I'm buying the 70-300 VR later this month. Also, as others have said, that lens is excellent optically as well. There's a photo in the Nikon Wednesday Pics of a bird in flight shot at the full 300mm and it's sharp as a tack.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilsivan Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p>Get the VR. . Definately worth the extra money. Personally, VR is one of those innovations from which you can't go back.<br> <a href=" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alin_daju Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 <p>VR especially for when at 300, and because of the aperture is small.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallasmcvickerphotography Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 <p>VR. I have this lens and when you forget to turn it back on, you notice. It is worth it.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eco_foto Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 <p>I would go with the 70-300mm. because of the aperture ring and the flexability this allows</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now