johan_erasmus Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 I have hade a great deal of success and fun building pin hole cameras, and am planning to build a new one around the 11X14 film size. The only thing is the exposure times become insanely long. I was wondering if it would pay to use some form of lens instead. Does anyone know of any way to obtain a lens with enough coverage for little or no cost. (I had hoped not to spend much more than the cost of the film itself.) I have a huge range of MF and 35mm lenses but none come close to covering except in an ultra wide macro situation - no real use. I am looking for a trick or idea along the lines of using one or more elements from an existing lens or any other suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art_haykin Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 A simple meniscus lens of the correct diameter and grind (focal length) should do the trick. Just a big box camera,and you'll have to settle for box camera image quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_balko3 Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 Try a dealer like: http://www.surplusshed.com one of the projection or copier lenses might work for you. A second posibility is a used process lens. Some makes such as JML/NuArc and older Wollensak/Raptar appear on eBay and sometimes sell for well less than $20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean_lastoria Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 Look in this month's View Camera magazine -- Mr. Simons out did himself on this one -- a complete article on DIY lenses. I'm back on the VC bandwagon. Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_galli4 Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 Here's some to look at. Not exactly cheap/ free but you might get in for $150. With a lens/ aperture it opens up the door to use Freestyle lith film which is about a 10th the cost of normal film. Also with lith film you can tape it to the back of the box with the lights (red of course) on. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1373690862http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1374494844http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1374907500http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1374245414http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1374617516 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
struan_gray Posted August 21, 2002 Share Posted August 21, 2002 A good source of cheap to free lenses for 11x14 is the lens off an overhead projector. They will cover the format with a bit of coma in the corners, but when stopped down to, say, f64 or f128 they sharpen up nicely while still being faster than a typical long pinhole. Modern ones can be surprisingly good, and are often coated to boot. Other cheapie lenses which work at high f-stops are drugstore reading glasses, Sherlock-Holmes magnifiers or the front element of a yard sale kid's telescope. If you are prepared to spend $100 or so, an old process lens is a leap in quality for not much expenditure. The more obscure but still high quality ones like Wray, Agfa, Kowa etc tend to be a better buy if you're on a tight budget. Spend a few hundred and the field opens up considerably. Modern process lenses will be bitingly sharp, although fitting them to a shutter often doubles the price. Some older taking lenses like the 300mm and 360 mm convertible Symmars are also available in this price range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_osborne Posted August 21, 2002 Share Posted August 21, 2002 One time I took the screw-in filter-type close-up lens from a set and put it in the shutter of my 13" Wollensak triple convertible (it fit!) and it was about as sharp as the Wollensak! The #3 is a 1/3-meter lens, or 330mm, the #2 is 1/2 meter or 500mm, and the 1 is a meter or 1000mm. The latter two should cover 11x14--but I think the diameter of the close-up lens may be a factor--mine was large, I think 62mm. The diameter may also influence exposure--the natural aperture being larger with a larger lens. The distance from film to lens is of course the focal length for infinity, closer for hyperfocal distance or for close ups. As with all lenses, the closer the focus the greater the coverage, but size of aperture does not increase coverage with all lenses--I think it would with a simple lens (miniscus). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johan_erasmus Posted August 21, 2002 Author Share Posted August 21, 2002 Eureka - Thanks Charles that was exactly the kind of information I needed, seeing as I already have several sets of close-up lenses. I will check out the feasability. Thanks also to everybody else who responded. I was aware of some of the process lenses on e*ay but could not evaluate them without a major research effort. I was also concerned that I would end up getting the whole 11X14 along with the lens. Equipment addicts will know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean_lastoria Posted August 22, 2002 Share Posted August 22, 2002 The close up lens is what the article is about in Vew Camera. Check it out. Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now