wedding-photography-denver Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 <p>Kay,</p> <p>When I shoot the spin, I generally use CWA metering and ttl, then set -0.7 of FEC and make the SS around 1/20th. I then set my aperture to make the ambient about 3 stops under when metered with average. In order to ascertain this setting, I walk around and take a few quick matrix readings then set my cam to -3 stops using that info. What it gives me is a darker overall image, with more defined hightlights and then your brides dress ends up more or less perfectly exposed and pops nicely from the background. If that made sense, you're smarter than me.</p> <p>Nice shot overall.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron_steedman Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 <p>Missy, well done. And yeah... it looks even better without the slipping hair!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bc_photo Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 <p>Does this bother anyone else?</p> <p>It looks like there are water / dust spots on the image from the lens? e.g., 200px to the exact left of where veil is attached to bride's head, and 300px above and slightly right to groom's crown.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_schilling___chicago_ Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 <p>Good eye BC Photo, it does look like sensor dust spots. These could be easily fixed in PS but they could also be easily missed as well.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjogo Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 <p>I simply set my zoom at 17mm --iso 400 -- f4 1/15th and bounce a strobe into a white card --- I expose as close to ambient as possible --the strobe freezes .....turn and fire.........Don't think the bride would notice a few spots or the slight elevation of the whites -- probably do not pay you enough to be that detailed ///</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markonestudios Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 Hi Kay, just out of curiosity, could we see the colour version too? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missy_kay Posted August 26, 2009 Author Share Posted August 26, 2009 <p>Sure lol<br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2487/3861111514_3ac9ee9814_o.jpg" alt="" width="472" height="315" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_knographer Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 <p>So long as you're getting your image edited I opened it in RAW, recovered the highlights, balanced the flesh tones and<br> cleaned up the dark line above his head. I love B&W, but with this image I think I like the color version better.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now