jim_mohundro1 Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 I replaced my 5-year old economically uncleanable Canon 950i with a new, well-rated (at least by Consumer Reports) PIXMA 4600 at the same price that would be my out-of-warranty minimum cost at my Canon-approved service provider--plus any replacement parts required, so that seemed a reasonable deal (the price direct from Canon was at 15% off the "suggested retail price", which seemed to be consistent with what I could sample on the web, and included free overnight FedEx shipping). I'm not a professional with professional-printer needs and I'd been happy enough with the 950i for its several functional years. A couple questions: I opted (too late--I've already received the 4600, but I'm curous) for the 4600 based partly on the reviews and partly on the fact that, of the under $200 Canon photoprinters (my budget), the 4600 has about 4300 print nozzles in contrast to the "all-in-one" Canons that each have about 2,200 print nozzles, reasoning that printing quality ought to be somewhat better with the 4600; however, I belatedly realized that 4300 or so nozzles are even more likely to clog than 2,200. Right? Second, the Canon tech support person said I should make a few prints at least once a week to help keep the nozzles wet and clear. Is that about right, or should I be printing even more often to achieve that maintenance purpose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now