chris_waller Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>Not a question but a heads-up on progress in the Great British Photography War.<br>In this week's British Journal of Photography (24th July 2009), there is a report on the judgement by the eminent Law Lord, Lord Carlile, in which he condemns the abuse of the Terrorism Act, 2000, by police.<br>Lord Carlile states, "It should be emphasised that the photography of the police by the media or amateurs remains as legitimate as before ...". <br>He further states, " Police officers who use force or threaten force in this context run the real risk of being prosecuted themselves for one or more of several criminal and disciplinary offences."<br>There is to be a special report in the BJP next week.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted June 29, 2009 Author Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>Aaargh - wrong date! Should be 18/6/09, but here's a link anyway.<br> <a href="http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=863068">http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=863068</a></p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>That's excellent. To be on the safe side though, you should take a high court judge along with you when photographing Mr Plod at his work.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev_400d Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>There have been a number of cases where members of the public have photographed police assaulting members of the public (usually demonstrators). <br> The police have responded by arresting the photographer using extreme restraint and distraction techniques (ie trussing them up and putting pressure on pain points on the neck etc).<br> Watch the video: <a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/film+raises+police+brutality+questions/3225227">http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/film+raises+police+brutality+questions/3225227</a><br> <br> The police seem to think they are the masters of society rather than their servants! </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamting Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>Winning the war? I think UK photographers are trying to gain back <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7888301.stm">lost ground</a>.</p> <p>On the other hand photographers in the US will get harassed and/or arrested for photographing the police, although it isn't explicitly illegal for them to do so (from what I can tell).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_ferling Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>Three days ago I was in Atlantic Beach and happened upon a set for Jennifer Aniston's latest movie, bounty hunter. I was in the adjacent lot ready to capture a shot, as non-flash photography was allowed so long as everyone remained quiet. Until I whipped out my rig. I was then greeted by a member of the crew whom told me that a police office sent him to ask me to move off what was apparently private property (I was the only one in that lot). I told the man that I was not a pap or member of the press. He said I was allowed to shoot, just not so close. I asked where the property line ends, moved and swapped out for a longer lens.<br> In this case the members of the set were very accommodating.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted June 30, 2009 Author Share Posted June 30, 2009 <p>William,<br> Yes, perhaps, as Churchill said in 1942, " This is not, perhaps, the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning ...". We have a long way to go to reach the original front line.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now