shots worth sharing Posted May 23, 2009 Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>I just had to try it, didn't I? I don't understand the optical issues but that "S" suggested this was a mismatch right from the git-go. Beyond that, though, the rig just eats up an awful lot of light, forcing ISO, shutter speed and DOF compromises. Even accounting for operator error, I think the experiment was successful in demonstrating that it's <strong><em>not</em> </strong> a good idea ;~) None of that "conversion only" business here, btw--these are seriously processed.</p> <p>I guess you can expect similar experiments with the AF 1.7 and Tamron 1.4 down the road...</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 23, 2009 Author Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>Robin Backwards</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 23, 2009 Author Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>Woodpecker again</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpo3136b Posted May 23, 2009 Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>Was there a monopod or tripod involved?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserere_mei Posted May 23, 2009 Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>Dave, they're not that bad (apart from the Nuclear Blue sky in #2 :-). Your Dragon might work well with the 1.7x AF TC after all. And wouldn't that be a big coup, huh?</p> <p>The Robin's arse seems to be the best of the batch as far as focusing goes. How much did you crop? And is that really a Robin? It certainly isn't what we call a Robin in the UK.</p> <p>John, if you had seen a photo of the lens, you wouldn't be asking that question :-D</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 23, 2009 Author Share Posted May 23, 2009 <p>I certainly used a tripod, John, but I'm not really satisfied with it and, at 2000mm, total stillness becomes mega-super critical, I guess. Yep, that's a Robin, Mis (or what passes in these parts) but, as you note, not its best side ;~) No cropping at all. No doubt I get better results w/o the tc (this one anyway) and cropping down.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_jackson4 Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 <p>Holy focal length, Dave... :) That's like 3000mm in old money... Are you trying to photograph these birds or tickle their rear ends with the front element...? ;) Either way, excuse us if we close the curtains here... :)</p> <p>Out of curiosity, I thought I'd try to sharpen up the last one a bit:</p> <p><img src="http://koti.welho.com/pwilkins/DH3.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>Looks a bit overcooked, I guess, although that's partly due to working on the small JPEG... Just lean back a bit when viewing... :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 24, 2009 Author Share Posted May 24, 2009 <p>Wow, Paul--you're a magician! </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jptreen Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 <p>that's it Dave, Paul's shown it's the perfect combo! I'll expect all your shots from now on to be shot at least above 0.2 meters in focal length or above!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 25, 2009 Author Share Posted May 25, 2009 <p>Yeah, that's the ticket--I'll shoot 'em and sent them off to Paul for pp ;~) Just to compare apples & apples, here are some shots with the 1000mm alone, cropped to ~ 6MP and processed with a skill level consistent (ie, inept) with the first batch. </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 25, 2009 Author Share Posted May 25, 2009 <p>and</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted May 25, 2009 Author Share Posted May 25, 2009 <p>And here's the other side of that Robin. But, seriously, Paul really opened my eyes--I have <strong><em>got</em> </strong> to keep working on my pp!</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now