Jump to content

Sekor C vs. KL lens quality


steven_d._johnson

Recommended Posts

<p>As far as internals... K/L's have plastic gears in the shutters, non-repairable, while non-Cs and Cs were mostly brass shutters with plenty of adjustment room and interchangable parts (within series) untill Mamiya started cutting back on costs and went to stamped steel and rivited modules in later C and NB lenses.<br>

Once the real economic situation got worse and they were heading down the tubes, their shutters became disposables and construction quality lessened. The hype about better coatings n glass was a ploy to sell more to people chasing the market trends in the hope to recover. Yes the coatings may have gotten better but that is just the evolution of all lenses in general compared to 30 and 40 year old lenses we still enjoy today. All Mamiya lenses were "Pro quality glass" and are, if not, superior to any pro lens on the market today.</p>

<p> </p>

The more you say, the less people listen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Some of the KL lenses are optically different to the C lenses and more in line with the RZ lenses. Eg. the 90mm KL has a floating element. I have never seen a proper test.<br>

You can use KL lenses on the ProS (with the exotic exceptions metioned above), you just need to take off the shim/collar before you mount it.<br>

Some of the KL lenses are very overpriced on the used market, esp the 65mm - the C lenses are excellent and much less. Note that there is no KL 50mm.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...