steve_levine Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>These seem like great cameras. But they seem way too costly and a decade or two late for the market? Who will buy these? Except for the built in meters (and multi formats). What advantage do these have over the millions of old folders that are available at a fraction of the ($2200) cost?<br> CV always seem to hit home runs, but this time I'm puzzled.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_drew4 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>I believe it is/was conceived as a collector's piece originally. Some of the people behind CV have a great desire to collect and to resurrect older brands on new retro cameras. Steve, I fail to see any "advantage" and think that if folders were inherently designed better, they would not have become antiques & museum pieces. There is some argument in the "cool-factor" this folder presents, tho'.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bueh Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>It's a luxury item for collectors and very affluent photographers who want "the best". If money is no problem for you, this would be the folder camera to buy to impress your peer group or even use it to take some pictures.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a._t._burke Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>Are they out? </p> <p>Tom Burke</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benny_spinoza Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>This is a so-called luxury good or item. It is not needed by professionals, but is geared towards photography enthusiasts who have a good deal of disposable income....and I mean disposable!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_layton Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 When others ask for my opinion of what is the "best" camera...I typically answer "the one you have with you." Years ago, I bought and then (stupidly) sold a like new (truly unused w/unused case) Zeiss Super Ikonta C - latest version with coated tessar and MX synch....what a beautiful piece! Now I have a Mess Ikonta w/tessar coming in the mail, and am looking forward to rekindling my relationship with MF folders. But in most of these older folding cameras, a conspiracy of design and technology (non computer aided design of front element focussing, and unreliable film flatness) - made them kind of iffy at times. Results from my Super Ikonta were best when focussed at infinity, w/lens set somewhere around f/11. Contre-jour lighting also helped a bit, as did making sure to wind forward just before a photo, otherwise the film tended to "relax" and bulge a bit. But oh, what a joy to carry this in a pocket! The idea of realizing near-view camera quality from such a compact, light package is so compelling...and now, to think of another folder - but with some critical technological updates thrown in which should mean more reliable and consistent results (flatter film, better lens, etc)...yes - 2200 may be a little steep - but compare this price to that of a truly mint example of a Bessa 2 with a Heliar (or even higher with an Apo Lanthar)...and my guess is the new Bessa 3 begins to look pretty reasonable...and you can bet that both the quality and consistency of results - over a wide range of both aperture values and distances, will truly set this new folder apart from its older, but still venerable counterparts. A home run? Depends on the needs/desires/dreams of the user. My hope for this new folder is that it will be successful enough to launch another one of similar design...but with a 55mm lens - and perhaps also introduce a two piece close up set for the 80mm - consisting of a closeup lens and a viewfinder focus/parallax correction plate. If this could be realized, then, for me, this would be a ball hit outta the park! The only thing better (but unlikely I'm afraid) would be to realize a rennaisance of the MF folder - which would create a bit of healthy competition...increasing options and (perhaps) lowering prices a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_layton Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 ps...also compare the new Bessa 3 price to current prices of the relatively contemporary Plaubel Makina 67, a very interesting camera in its own right but with a few definite quirks. My guess is that if Plaubel had come out with a design more akin to that of the earlier folders, (but again, with updated optics and better film flatness), it would have been more successful and long lived in the marketplace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>In an earnest answer to Steve's question about what advantages it has, here would be my take:<br> 1. It is brand new. That means it has a warranty, it has just come out of a good factory, so everything will be working 100% correctly, and if it isn't, you get another or yours is fixed for free.<br> 2. Being brand new, it will not have 50+ years of wear and tear on it, like most other folding cameras. Even well-cared for cameras that old need more care than most new cameras.<br> 3. Given the new technology, it is likely to have much better optics in both the lens and viewfinder. It will also be likely to be more rigid, and therefore having more consistently high performance results. <br> 4. This camera has a TTL meter with feedback in the viewfinder, as well as AE operation. Speeds from 4s to 1/500th. No other classic folders have this that I am aware of (besides the Plaubel Makina, which is a bit different type design)<br> 5. It shoots 6x6 and 6x7 in both 120 and 220 -- that is a quite versatile option in a camera this size.<br> Now it is not going to be in my bag, but if you are interested in the smallest and lightest 6x7 camera that works like a fairly modern camera (optically and operationally), then it is a good choice. The price is quite steep, but voigtlander really does make some great stuff -- people who have shot with their M lenses will usually admit that they are very close to the Leica equivalents. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjaminoliverhicks Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>Check out the Mamiya 7II prices at <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=357366&Q=&is=REG&A=details">B&H</a> and <a href="http://www.adorama.com/MY72VP.html">Adorama</a>. This is the only other modern medium format rangefinder that you can buy new that I know of. The price of the Bessa III doesn't look so far off to me.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelkh Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 <p>Stuart, are you sure it has a TTL meter? I thought it had an SPD cell next to the rangefinder window.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in Austin Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 <p>Some long replies on this one. The silicon photodiode is located beside the RF window.</p> <p>After seeing the collapse of most medium format gear manufacturers - I'm happy to see Fuji and Cosina bring out a niche camera. - It's not a system camera. - So, hang on to your Mamiya RF camera, if you have one.</p> <p>I currently use 3 RF folders, one 6x6 Super Isolette, a Record III and a Bessa II - plus my cartoonish Fuji GW690 III - non of which are a perfect camera - but I make do pretty well with them.</p> <p>If you can afford one, this Bessa III / 667 has a modern RF viewfinder with parallax corrected frame-lines, automat film winding and hopefully a superb unit-focusing lens - in addition to the built in meter and a semi-auto mode. That's a world away from an Agfa Record III. If the performance of my big Fuji 6x9 is an indicator, the resolution of the modern lens will blow the Record III out of the water.</p> <p>It's a shame that a 6x9 isn't being offered. Even at this price, I'd sell GW690 III and get one. Just a personal preference.</p> Best Regards - Andrew in Austin, TX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_mareno Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 <p>It's an interesting camera, but the price is about double what it should be. It being a new folder is offset by just that. It's a new folder. It won't be built of the same quality materials, or with the same expert craftsmanship as the old cameras. I also seriously doubt the pics from it will be as good as the best of the Old Guard.</p> <p>The only relevant thing about the warranty is that you'll probably be needing it. If Leica had come up w/ this I would have paid pretty much whatever they were asking for it, but having used several of the "Voigtlander" cameras I am in no hurry to use another one. Maybe the marketing department can put a good spin on this thing, but I see it as being nothing but trouble for the prospective users. The majority of them will be in the landfills 25 years from now, unlike my 74 year old Welta.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_larese1 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 <p>Excellent optics in a 6x7 format you can slip in your (larger) pocket or backback, for practical reasons. Beyond that, it's cool. I love my Bessa 35mms, and am thankful this company produces wonderful film cameras and optics.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_parry Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 <p>Don't forget its really a Fuji camera, just being marketed as a Voigtlander everywhere other than Japan. You should expect it to be the same build quality as the fuji rangefinders, xpan, GX617, GX680 etc etc. It's probably actually manufactured by Cosina, since it was reputedly a joint development between Fuji and Cosina.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_parry Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 <p>P.S. Voigtlander is only a trademark currently leased by Cosina (since 1999), so don't necessarily equate that with "Voigtlander" cameras of the past, its just a name.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now