wesleyfarnsworth Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 <p>Anyone have imput on the quality of the following lens? Nikkor 28.80 1:3.3-5.6? I'm thinking of purchasing it for portraits mainly. I found one used for about $80. Any imput on if it's a good price and/or lens?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_bisom Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 <p>Good price.... I see completed listings on eBay for $50. So it depends on how much you trust an eBay lens vs how you are acquiring your version. As to whether it's a good lens.... what am I comparing it to? Ken seems to like it (but I don't know how much stock I put into what Ken writes!): http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/28-80mm-g.htm?refby=rflAID021866&sku=NK2880AFGU<br> Personally, I like the 24-85 f/2.8-4.0 or a 17-55 f/2.8 (in terms of zoom lenses), either of which will be a lot more than $80.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedding-photography-denver Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 <p>Its a bit soft IMO, and build is not great. Still for $80, not too bad for at least a backup lens if needed.</p> <p>If you charge for your work, get a lens that does your work the justice it deserves. It that lens costs $80, what is your work worth? Not that a cheap lens cannot get the shot, but there is usually a reason for the more costly glass.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcorona Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 <p>You mentioned you purchased it primarily as a portrait lens. Which means about 40mm to 80mm (If you're on a cropped sensor) would be most useful to you on this lens. Staying within that range would allow you to minimize the distortion of facial features, particularly the nose.<br> At 40mm you're already at F/4 as your widest aperture. For most this usually isn't enough to blur out backgrounds. Getting something with a wider aperture would also increase the effectiveness of your flash.<br> This lens would be a good lens for other things, But I wouldn't consider it a good lens for portraits. For portraits, and in the same price range, I would get the 50mm f/1.8.<br> ------------- ---------------- ----------<br> "If that lens costs $80, what is your work worth?"<br> David, If you were buying a print, would you ask the photographer what lens he used and then based on that try to haggle the price out?</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_becker2 Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 <p>I would rather have a 50mm f1.8 or 18-70mm in DX for portrait work.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now