Nowhereman Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 <p>>>>If your images are being examined by people who can see the difference between a $1400 18mm Zeiss and a $3000 Leica 18mm...<<<</p> <p>Actually the price of the Zeiss 18mm Distagon at Popflash is $1,100, with the correct M-mount.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 <p>The popflash Zeiss is uncoded.</p> <p>Mitch, for your contrasty style I imagine the Zeiss works well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
35mmdelux Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 <p>Leica is starting to get brutal. Now, if they can figure out a FF M9 we might be talking business. The 18mm will undoubtedly rock as do the f/1.4 superwides.</p> <p>Rock on!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 <p>Don't know about the 18, but the new Summilux's came out of S2 development. R&D can bring unexpected benefits. Hopefully there will be more to come in the way of camera and lens development.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_layton Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 <p>My concern regarding lenses that have supposedly come out of S2 development would be their compatibility with film. (remember film?) Does better chip performance equal better film performance - or at least no compromises regarding film performance - with the latest M-lenses?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug herr Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 <p> <p ><a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=498590">John Layton</a> wrote: "My concern regarding lenses that have supposedly come out of S2 development would be their compatibility with film. (remember film?) Does better chip performance equal better film performance - or at least no compromises regarding film performance - with the latest M-lenses?"</p> <p > </p> <p >So far, Leica is resisting the direction some other makers have been following of relying more on post-exposure software correction, instead Leica's design goals are to minimize distortion, chromatic errors and vignetting in the lens. As far as I know this would make the lens as usable on film as with a digital sensor.</p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_moscola Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 <p>The Zeiss 18mm f/4 is a terrific lens. But, I bought the Leica 18mm f/3.8 Super-Elmar. Leica lenses are investments that last a lifetime. They are great lenses, they retain their value and can even increase in value and can easily be sold. So, in addition to the M8.2 issues regarding 6-bit coding and with the added thought for the longevity/demand of Leica lenses making them good long-term investments, I bought the Leica 18mm. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now