Jump to content

A couple night shots


steve_t.1

Recommended Posts

<p>Now that I've figured out how to stick a photo on this board (I think), I should get to posting some pics. Nothing is edited on the 'puter yet other than size. Calibration device is on order. Hope they look okay on your end.</p>

<p>This first one is from below the new I-35W bridge crossing the Mississippi River in Minneapolis. This is the bridge that collapsed August 2007, new bridge up in under a year. Quite a thing. The belly of the bridge has a fancy lighting system, different colors can be programmed. Second and third photos (same, just a crop) are looking at downtown Minneapolis from the historic Stone Arch Bridge. It was a Saturday night (duh!), so few building lights were on, buildings lit only be ambient street lighting. City feels asleep with no pedestrians around- it was about 7:30pm. Early December just before our first real snow, but it was sure cold, just above zero F. Both shots with the new K20D, Tamron 18-250 lens.</p>

<p><img src="http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p26/stevet_010/IMGP0076.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="532" /></p>

<p><img src="http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p26/stevet_010/IMGP0111.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="532" /></p>

<p><img src="http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p26/stevet_010/IMGP0111crop-1.jpg" alt="" width="799" height="340" /></p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Dan- camera settings were:<br>

Bridge- manual mode, F-4, 3 seconds, ISO 100, 27mm focal length (40mm equiv. in 35mm film).<br>

Downtown- manual mode, F-9.5, 15 seconds, ISO 100, 21mm focal length (31mm equiv.)<br>

Note all these settings were happy coincidence that things turned out. I can read all the books I want, but I still learn best by doing, hoping I'm applying a smidgen of what I read! Can you tell that I often forget about the ISO setting? Winter night and I'm shooting at 100. Hey, it worked.</p>

<p>Andrew- I agree on the remarkable speed of this bridge rebuilding project. I know this is a photo site, but I'll share a little info on the project. 6pm, Aug 1, 2007. Complete and sudden failure of a 65 foot high, 450+ foot long span, 8 lanes wide. 13 dead, some 100 or so injured. (Would have been worse, but 50% of the bridge lanes were closed for road construction at the time of collapse.) About 10 days to recover all bodies. About 6 weeks to clear the site. 11 months from ground breaking to opening for traffic. (I was at the front of the line on my motorcycle at 5am the day they opened the new bridge. If it would have been raining at the time of collapse, I likely would have been on the bridge at the fateful moment. Long story on that... I guess I have a special connection with this bridge. Weird, huh?) 24/7 construction schedule for the entire project, except for Christmas day and a few-hour shut down on the collapse anniversary day. 600+ workers on site each day at the peak of construction. New bridge is 500 feet long, 10 lanes wide plus extra width to grow with more lanes or light rail. Here's a link to the MN Dept. of Trans. website talking all about the bridge, tons of info here about the old one, the new one, and even the NTSB investigation report.<br>

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/i35wbridge/index.html<br>

And a link to take you to photos of the aftermath, starting the next day. Incredible.<br>

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/i35wbridge/photos/</p>

<p>I have a feeling I'll be taking more photos here when the weather is more cooperative.<br>

Steve.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...