rayn Posted June 9, 2002 Share Posted June 9, 2002 After some research and examining the lenses I use most, I have decided to get the 24/2.8 and 50/1.4 for a Leica M7 (which I havn't bought yet but soon will). What viewfinder magnification is most optimized for this combo? I was considering the 0.85 + the 24mm hotshoe viewfinder. Anything wrong with this? I figured the 0.85 was best for the 50mm, and I'll be using the hotshoe viewfinder for the 24mm. On the other hand, I could get the 0.58 and not use a hotshoe viewfinder, but then would it be hard to use the 50mm with 0.58? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul hart Posted June 9, 2002 Share Posted June 9, 2002 Without any hesitation I would go for the .58 when it comes out - I'm waiting for one too! The .58 is absolutely fine with the 50mm in my experience, and as you evidently realise, the extremes of the finder approximate to the 24mm field; probably not as accurate as a 24mm finder, but OK for most purposes. If you weren't totally convinced by the .58 with your 50, you could always get the 1.25x magnifier - if you can find one; if you are going to have an accessory somewhere, that one is a lot less obtrusive than the hotshoe finder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackflesher Posted June 9, 2002 Share Posted June 9, 2002 If you are leaning towards the .85 + 24 finder for the 50, then I would stay away from the .58 body. In truth, it is best to use the optional VF with the 24 anyway; while the the RF window on the .58 is close to the view of the 24, it does not give the same look as the finder -- which much more closely resembles the persective of the 24 lens -- nor does the window itself adjust for perspective like the framelines do. I would get yourself a .72 body, add in the 24 VF and get the 1.25x magny later if you think you need more finder mag for use with the 50. The magny effectively turns your .72 into a .85. Now you have a dual-use body that has all of the framelines available, should your desires draw you to try other focals. Cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nesrani Posted June 9, 2002 Share Posted June 9, 2002 Jack said it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_tai Posted June 9, 2002 Share Posted June 9, 2002 Ditto Jack's advice. In the future if you decide to try out the 35mm focal length the .72x will be more or less perfect with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefan www.randlkofer.co Posted June 10, 2002 Share Posted June 10, 2002 a very important point is whether you wear glasses or not. forget the .85 if you wear them, unless the only important thing in your viewfinder is the focussing patch. with glasses the only really comfortable magnification is the .58, though you might get along with the .72. whatever you do, go to a proper shop to try them out side by side, with the 50mm lens attached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now