ryourth Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Recently have started using DPI for my images & am very happy with the resuts.The colours are excellent & very lifelike & to me the image has a ceretain brightness or luminous, not the brighness control where you can make everything brighter or darker.. It is hard to describe, perhaps you could say the images glow. However, downloading the image to PN this glow is lost. Trying to compensate by altering thr brigtness & saturation to compensate does not work. Any suggestions? Thanks-Ross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
images_in_light_north_west Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Maybe its your sharpening thats giving you the problem when you dawn size your image's ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainer_t Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 -- "Recently have started using DPI for my images" I assume "DPI" should be read as "DPP". -- "However, downloading the image to PN this glow is lost." A blind guess ... are you using AdobeRGB colorspace for your images? Not all browsers and not even all viewers are capable to handle such images properly. In that case, convert the same Raw file to sRGB, resize and upload to Pnet and check if that makes a difference. Also, check if the effect only happens with resized images. Post an (unresized) crop of an image. This should not lose its glow...but if it does, the process of resizing is not to blame, since it wasn't resized (just cropped). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn1965 Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 I have never figured out DPP.. it seems cumbersome and slow. I have not dug into to it too hard, but I just get frustrated after ten minutes of using it and wonder why it exists. However, I see some folks really like it, so perhaps I would think of it differently if I could push through the frustration barrier Shawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mendel_leisk Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 I concur with Shawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryourth Posted September 25, 2008 Author Share Posted September 25, 2008 Thanks to all for voicing your opinions. Rainier- Took your advice & switched to sRGB & noticed a definite improvement.. Was surprised to learn that sRGB is the standard color space for Windows & is widely used for the standard color space for monitors, digital cameras & scanners.Thanks again. Best regards-Ross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie_chan9 Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 thanks for raising the question Ross, i've been seeing the same problem myself with uncropped, undownsized images as i could see amazing colours in DPP for an image, but when it becomes the desktop background the colour's off. the worst is when the same picture comes up in the windows screen saver, it looked almost like i took the picture thru a glass - a little soft and semi-desaturated colours... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_sibson1 Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Shawn, Mendel ... DPP is the secret weapon of those of us that have climbed the learning curve! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitmstr Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 >>sRGB is the standard color space for Windows & is widely used for the standard color space for monitors<< ...and the WWW. Working with colorspace(s) is something that everyone getting into digital imaging should learn first. Each colorspace has a function and a place. As far as DPP is concerned, the program is good and works quite well but, it's NOT meant to be a full blown digital imaging editor at the level of PS. For photographs it works quite well and it even has some interesting features, especially when converting from RAW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petemillis Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Shawn, Mendel....what is so slow and difficult and cumbersome about Canon DPP? It's so simple to use. I'm surprised you can even use a computer at all if you find DPP so hard! Seriously though, it's well worth getting to know it properly and the learning curve really ain't that steep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_myers Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 I occasionally use DPP for high ISO RAW conversions, then pass the image over to Photoshop (CS2 currently, seems I nearly always skip a generation with PS). But most of the time I just use Bridge/ACR/PS. It's a lot faster for me. Yes, I suspect the original poster's problem is most likely RGB/sRGB or possibly calibration and profiling. I always shoot RGB, but for the web I'll convert a copy to sRGB. I often find I need to tweak saturation and/or contrast a bit after converting to sRGB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now