paulo_cortez Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Hi, After buying my first DSLR (400D), I decided to sell my Sony DSC-P10 with all its accessories (MPK-PHA underwater housing, VAD-PHA Lens Adapter, 2x and 0.45x conversion lenses, etc. - see auction picture). Almost 2 years have gone and now I own a 5D...yes, selling also the 400D helped me paying it. Although still on a honeymoon with the 5D, I miss a lot the portability of a P&S, amongst many other things related to this type of cameras. Therefore, I decided to buy my second P&S. Lately, I've been checking some reviews but one thing is worrying me: the high noise levels above ISO400 in most samples. I guess that must be related to the high pixel densities as manufacturers tend to increase pixel counts (but not sensor sizes) due to marketing reasons. Anyway, I'm still in this quest but maybe I need some help. Thus, What do you suggest taking into account the following requisites: - low noise levels, even above ISO400 - fast AF - the main reason for selling the DSC-P10 was its IMHO slow AF - I missed a lot of underwater shots waiting for it to get the focus right - not great deal on dry land but imagine doing that with only the air you've in your lungs at 6m of depth - short focal length on the wide end - 28mm or under - sensor between 6-10MP I want it mainly for holidays and for underwater shots as I'm planning to buy an underwater housing (Ikelite?) with external flash (strobe) possibilities (on "snotty" waters, subjects are usually full of suspended particles in front, resulting in an erratic auto-focusing and reflected on-body flash light; I can get away without on shallow dives but if I'm going below 30-40 meters a strobe is needed). Please, forget the Fuji FinePix F31fd: it's more expensive now than when it came out! Thanks in advance for your help, Paulo<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulo_cortez Posted July 25, 2008 Author Share Posted July 25, 2008 BTW, one UW shot with my missed Sony DSC-P10 and MPK-PHA Marine Pack<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulo_cortez Posted July 25, 2008 Author Share Posted July 25, 2008 And another: Sony DSC-P10 and lens adapter VAD-PHA with 0.45x wide-angle lens<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Even the 1/2.5" CCDs on recent Panasonic digicams have low noise levels at 400 ISO with the Venus IV processor. So you would think the upcoming LX3 (24-50mm) with 1/1.63" CCD would be acceptable at 800 ISO. Sony makes some competitive models but I don't pay attention to them because of memory stick. Some Sony model was top-rated for high-ISO noise by Consumer Reports, but when I checked it on dpreview.com it didn't look that great to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulo_cortez Posted July 26, 2008 Author Share Posted July 26, 2008 Hi Bill, I checked the LX3 at dpreview and, yes, quite interesting specs although a little pricey, above 500 euros, and, obviously, no waterproof cases available yet for it - but it looks worth waiting. I'm also considering the Sealife DC800 with the external flash - nice price for the set although no reviews yet available. http://www.sealife-cameras.com/cameras/dc800_pro.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john schroeder Posted July 26, 2008 Share Posted July 26, 2008 I have been very pleased with my Nikon Coolpix S600. It has the best noise levels of any compact camera I have seen to date. Up to 1600 iso it is fantastic for a point-n-shoot. Here is a link to my S600 gallery http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=839912 And another link to a thread I started when I first got the camera. http://www.photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00PlXX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Tardio Posted July 26, 2008 Share Posted July 26, 2008 Not of them have decent noise levels. In fact, they seem to be getting worse. You either get less noise with lower resolution, or more noise with higher resolution. The LX3 may be better than the LX2, but the noise on that thing was awful. <p> The camera that you, me and everyone else wants hasn't been produced yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now