karl_fermedfor Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 I've been hearing a lot of talk lately about the introduction of a new (dedicated) digital back for the RB system. While I personally have no interest in acquiring such a back (I am perfectly happy with Kodak Portra and film origination, thanks very much), and I have a pretty complete RB system, I was still looking to acquire one of the Mamiya 100-200mm zooms, which I foresee as being affected, even more so than other glass, as zooms have become more and more dominant. Does anyone speculate that the price of RB glass is going to rebound just as 35mm cine glass has rebounded now that it is compatible with one of the new digital movie camera systems? Regards, ~K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erie_patsellis Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 Not sure where you've been looking, but in my experience RB prices have been on the rise the last year and a half or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_watson Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 Maybe, though there's no denying the steady downdraft on medium format system values. Unless or until Mamiya's digital back emerges, the price slide will continue. I'm stalking RB outfits actively and am shocked at how low the prices are falling relative to just 12-18 months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 There won't be any effect on second-hand prices, and it will remain a buyers' market. Reasons:(a) the size of the market for MF digital is too small to increase any demand for RB stuff(b) if you have 7K+ for a MF digital back, you probably have 2K for a new-in-the-box dedicated body. Given current sensor sizes, 645 would be a better choice for most people. By the way, unless I'm missin' something, a digital back for RB would essentially be a 2 x 3 Graflok or international back. This could be used on other cameras as well, although RB would be the most common. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erie_patsellis Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 Perhaps the system prices are falling, some individual lenses, the 37mm for example, have increased quite a bit over the last year. Good bodies and backs are getting harder to find as well. Most of what's out there is pretty well beat and in need of work to get it back to 100%. erie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_fermedfor Posted July 11, 2008 Author Share Posted July 11, 2008 Dave, do they still *make* new RB bodies? I know they still have inventory, but I thought the Mamiya 6x7s were all out of production. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt1 Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 Mamiya USA still sells new RB67 Pro SD bodies as far as I can tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wogears Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 You can get a ZD back for RB/RZ now. 'Crop Factor' is very high. Cost of a 6x7cm sensor would be bloody brutal, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack_welsh Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 I know that B&Hphotovideo sells new SD bodies, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_obrien4 Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 New SD bodies are $799 I believe. I'll stick with my BGN condition Pro-S though :). If anything, I'll spend the money on a lens overhaul as opposed to a brand spanking new body. Erie, you're right about the 37 milli and other, more specialized if you will, lenses going up in price. I paid more for my fish than the rest of my RB setup combined. It was worth it though, it's an amazing piece of glass. Karl, I haven't bought a whole lot of 35 millimeter gear lately, and I haven't purchased a video camera in an even longer time, but are you sure that the reason prices have gone up is because of their compatibility with cine cameras. The reason I ask is because, given the relative size of the video industry, only a very small amount of videographers own cameras that are 35mm lens compatible, or own 35mm adapters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now