Jump to content

How good the Tokina 12-24 f/4 really is ?


mauricio_orozco

Recommended Posts

This is going to be the first time that I will buy a wide angle lens and of course, I need your opinion. I am thinking

about the Tokina 12-24 f/4 for my Nikon D300. If anyone of you have tested this lens on the D300 or any other Nikon

camera from D80 and up, please share with me your experience. I am always looking for optical quality and I would

like to know if this lens is really as good as they say it is. Thank you for all your input and help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had zero complaints with the 12-24/4 Tokina. I think the question you have to ask yourself, is do you shoot in

situations where you would want a faster lens? If so, you may want to think of the new Tokina 11-16/2.8. I always shoot

the wide angle at f/5.6 or smaller so I prefer the wider range of the 12-24. It's a great lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the Tokina 12-24 was a fantastic lens. Then when I bought the Nikon 16-85mm, there was just no incentive to carry it around since the 16-85 covers really all the wide and telephoto I need most of the time. So I sold it. Am thinking of getting the Sigma 10-20mm but I want to see a lot of samples before I take the plunge. Wish Nikon made a 10mm or 11mm f4 prime wideangle, not a fisheye...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being pixel peeper, I noticed softer image on one side and sharper on the other at very high magnification on D200 and D70. I returned it and got replacement identical new one, that was much better.

 

Sold it in anticipation to get the FX format camera and the 14-24 FX lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tokina is sharp thoughout the zoom range and at all f/stop. The focus clutch is a great feature for me...A lot of the DX lenses have vignetting but this lens does not.. I cannot fault this lens but I am not a lens tester type person. I just shoot pictures. If it does not perform I get rid of it. This one is a keeper.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to own the Tokina 12-24 and I really liked it --sold it for a Tokina 11-16 for the f/2.8.

 

Any ways, very good pictures, always very pleased with them. I really liked the quality of the construction as the lens has a very nice solid feel to it. Not flimsy at all. There is actually a thread from a few weeks ago here where pictures were taken with the Nikon 12-24, Tokina 12-24, and the Tokina 11-16. Under a "controlled" test there is a difference. But, walking around taking shots there will be little to no difference in sharpness.

 

The remaining aspects of image quality will be subjective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you guys, but now I got another question, because I just bought the Nikon 16-85 mm VR II and according to Dave Lee ( above ), the range of the Tokina 12-24 when you pair it with the Nikon, it does not makes any sense, so, has anyone tested or shoot with the new Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 yet ? I would love to have that range and have the chance to shoot at f/2.8. Please, your advise !!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...