laurent-paul Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Great Job everyone. It was really worth all the pain you went through .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_photo Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 I agree. The site looks great, thanks yet again for all your hard work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_stemberg Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 <p>Holy Moses! Yes indeedy!</p> <p>I must be dreaming. I need to go sleep-walk for a while, and when I wake-up, I hope this dream is really really REAL!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Yes, indeedy. Cease and desist this consarned speed. It maketh me dizzy and causeth disruptions to my morning ablutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Yes, too fast. During the long page loads, I was making great progress through my 12,569 page <I>A Simplified Guide to the Zone System</i> James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Guys....I'm not really sure what to do here. I'm actually an Admin-bot XJ3400 and I'm only programmed to know what to do with users who complain about site performance. My processor gives me a "file not found" error when I look for what to do with complimentary posts. In any case, glad that the hard work is appreciated. The programmers put in some long days getting everything put back together and optimized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard-just-Leonard Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 It messed up the ratings too. My last two posts got NO 3/3's... what is wrong here? please look into that ;) thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meli d Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Quick interjection with a question while Josh is being complimented! ~ Josh, can you explain what the delay for uploads on critiques is? It used to be I could upload, and click right to the main page and the photo would be there (which I liked to print) ~ now there seems to be a longer delay' Can you explain? Also, Why no more links allowed in critique requests? I do appreciate the speed, too ' so thanks ' it is a bummer when the brain and fingers want to go so fast and not the site ; ) - - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 The delay may have to do with the way that images are handled by the new servers. I'll ask Jin about it. Links are no longer allowed in critique requests because people were using that area to try and increase their google ranking by linking to their own business or personal websites on every critique. Which is something that is not allowed on photo.net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meli d Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m3rdpwr Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 I don't get any more errors when going into unified view... :) -Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yesbut Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I only joined this site yesterday, so I cannot comment on how slow it used to be. But from the above it must have been very very slow, if the present speed is considered fast. Its taking minutes for pages to load - thought it might be a problem with my computer or server, just done a speed test: Download 1260 kbps Upload 337 kbps. So the problem isn't with the computer or server. Itﾒs a great site, and I would love to become an active member, but I donﾒt think I could cope with the frustration of waiting so long for pages to load - but Iﾒll keep trying for a little while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 There was some database work going on last night/this morning that was probably the cause of any slowness. The site is performing just fine for me now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m3rdpwr Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I agree is was funky earlier, but just fine now... -Mario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim_Lookingbill Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 Six seconds to go from this thread to the "Lighting" forum. It used to take up to about 15 seconds. I'm on AT&T DSL running a 2004 1.8ghz G5 iMac with Safari 1.3.2. No complaints. Good work Josh and the rest of the Photo.Net programmers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now