lars69 Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Hi, I am going to the states in two weeks and was a bit tempted to buy a new telephoto lens. So generally I am in favour of the 70-200 f4 L IS but I also like the f2.8 non- IS, the f2.8 IS is just more than I can afford. Anyway, I know the good and bad points of both, so that's not why i am writing. But I realised something I find strange. In the UK the f4 is around 730 pounds and the f2.8 930, so US$ 1450 and 1850. So the difference between both is quite large and the f2.8 (non-IS) is much more expensive than the F4 IS, almost 30%. At BH Photo in the states the f4 goes for 1060 and the f2.8 for 1140, so just 8 % difference. I found that quite strange, so if I buy the f2.8 in the US then I save almost 50%, if I buy the f4 IS I save much less. That's regardless of which lens is better for my purposes and I don't want to choose a lens purely by which one has the bigger saving. But I don't get why in the US both lenses cost almost the same but in the UK one cost much more than the other. Any ideas why that is? Find it a bit odd. Lars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danield Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Prices in the UK are a ripoff. You can find the f/4 IS version cheaper (see http://camerapricebuster.co.uk), but it's still quite expensive. In US, the f/4 probably still carries the "new model" premium. The f/2.8, especially the non-IS version has been around for a while and is on its way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken munn Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 "The f/2.8, especially the non-IS version has been around for a while and is on its way out." Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdigi Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 I know many people that LOVE The 2.8 Non IS version. IMO If you shoot motion I don't think IS is all that important since you usually will need a fast shutter anyway. just learn to hold the camera steady. again just my opinion, IS does make it a little easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_stemberg Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 I'm sure it's all how Canon reads what the market dictates in different parts of the world aside from taxes etc.. For instance with the Cashback programme running here in the UK, the 40D body is cheaper than the 450D body at the moment.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Canon has tended to sent prices at the time a lens was first released and although there may be a reduction once the lens is no longer new, prices have tended to stay stable for long periods, ignoring the impact of currency changes on relative prices between countries. The f/2.8 lens was introduced back in 1995 when the pound was $1.50-1.55, compared with the more recent level of close to $2. However, having said that prices tend to stay stable, I have seen several reports suggesting that Canon is about to increase lens prices in the USA by around 10% to correct for the falling dollar, effective 1st May. Do not assume that prices you see today will be available when you get to the US. You should also beware that in the US, prices are quoted excluding taxes. Where you buy in person you will be charged local sales tax (8.375% in NY, I believe). You are then liable for duty and VAT on the tax inclusive price on importing back to Europe. The exchange rate you will get via your credit card is also likely to be significantly less favourable than the interbank rate. You should do your sums carefully, taking account of the various factors. For Euroland buyers at the moment some of the best deals are to be had by buying from the UK, not the US (partly because they qualify for Canon cashbacks where applicable, and also because of the strength of the Euro). The sliding pound is making purchases outside the UK less attractive at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryn_evans Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 I'd not worry too much about the VAT at this end. I've brought loads of stuff back from the usa including camera gear and laptops and never once paid vat. Last time I send a small crate full of tools back to the UK all escaped duty. I'm planniong a similar purchase to you on my next trip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Bragging about tax evasion might bring an unwelcome knock at the door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars69 Posted April 25, 2008 Author Share Posted April 25, 2008 Thanks for the answers. I will probbably buy at BH Photo and ship it to my hotel address which is in Arizona. I blieve the NY sales tax doesn't apply in this case even though the law is about to change. With BH it used to be possible to buy with a non-US card and ship to a hotel, hope that still works. Regarding import duty, it's still worth to buy in the US. And thanks for the 1st May increase tip. I might just buy now to be sure. Lars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 You will find B&H's anti-fraud procedures for cardholder not present sales to foreign cardholders are much more complex these days. You may want to check with them once Passover is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 >> the f2.8 IS is just more than I can afford. While I understand and respect your financial considerations, I'd suggest you take a second look at the BTBACOO acronym. Happy shooting, Yakim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 I think the f/4 is cheaper in the UK: available from Jessops for 684 UKP less 45 UKP cashback (see camerapricebuster). That is equivalent to under UKP 520 before duty and taxes, or under $1,000 at typical credit card exchange rates. You also need to make an allowance for shipping in/from the US if not buying in person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryn_evans Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 There's a fine line between evasion and avoidance! It pays to do your homework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryepixels Posted April 27, 2008 Share Posted April 27, 2008 UK prices seem also as bad as those in Australia. I think you'll find the price difference due to supply/demand ... there's more demand for for the 2.8 so the retailers must compete more. I picked up the 2.8IS whilst recently in the US for approx 50% of the best street price available in Aust (US$1679 vs A$3199, and given exchange rate is almost 1:1 ... :-). I used Adorama, who did deliver to a hotel, but I had an established buying record with one credit card and called them to confirm the sale - they did take a little convincing to ship to other than billing address, though. Declaring at customs still didn't get close to the price I'd have to pay at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnvphoto Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Have a look on EBay. Seriously, I just bought the 70-200 f4 NON IS for 330, thats 120 less that jessops! http://stores.ebay.co.uk/FLASH-CAMERA_W0QQssPageNameZstrkQ3amefsQ3amesstQQtZkm That guy has a shop on ebay, ususally if you contact him by email he'll reduce the already low price he quotes on ebay. I also got the 100 f2.8 macro, with hood and filter,40 quid less than jessops want for the lens alone! Oh, and both qualify for the cashback deal that Canon is running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now