Jump to content

Best Buy in Used Medium Format


paul_mcevoy

Recommended Posts

Steve of course your right,

",box with the semiconductor is just a thing?" its not, its an amazing little tool that in

many ways kicks the pants off film, I just like to know in someways at least my

equipment is inadequate like me. I do shoot both almost equally. I only joke about the

soul to cover up the lack of mine.

 

Hasselblad too heavy for journalism? While the light meter issue is very true unless

you're talking 200's, last time I checked most pro DSLRs weigh in and take up a similar

amount of space to a Hassy. Though I wouldn't consider it a fast performer in the field

like his 5D. Then again Joakim wasn't taking that Pentax 6x7 into combat zones or on

presidential details.

 

Paul you have some good answers here, though we haven't heard a suggested budget

yet from you. I'll stick by the Yashica and Mamiya TLR recommendation for the lower

budget option if you just want to spend a month cranking some rolls through to try. All

the above mentioned cameras are good and as you know film camera prices have

never been better for allot of this good stuff.

 

It seems though that he is very familiar with his cameras and film and as you

mentioned, a master of available light. Your right to observe that film probably isn't his

secret. Good luck and good shooting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangefinders are fine for environmental portraits, but they generally don't focus close enough for tight head shots. I actually prefer environmental shots, so I use a Mamiya 7 II. Not an economical choice, however.

 

Fuji made a nice little p&s 645. Inexpensive, easy to use, and excellent lens. Not as quiet as a manual rangefinder, but the results are nice. More info here:

 

http://www.dantestella.com/technical/ga645.html

 

The SLR choices will be a bit noisy because of the mirror. This may be a problem if you prefer stealth. Lots of good choices in 645, and prices are pretty low.

 

I'd suggest, as have others, a TLR for your needs. The Minolta Autocord is very nice - lever focus, solid build, and a superb lens. It's a fantastic bargain, but factor in a CLA from someone like Paul Ebel. You could also look for a Ricoh Diacord or a Zeiss Ikoflex (a bit over-engneered with locks, but nice Tessar lens).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own a Mamiya 7ii, Rollei 6008, and Hasselblad 500 C/M. The real differences, IMHO, are in the breadth of the system. The Hasselblad has others beat hands down on the wealth of USEFUL system components. Of course, more expensive than the others, but used, as another respondent has said, the 500C/M kit with 80mm lens should be about $1000, perhaps even less. Then you have something you can build upon for years to come. Another thing to think about -- in ten years, there will probably not be anyone around to fix my Rollei, but I am sure someone will be able to fix my Hasselblad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your interest is portraits AND photojournalism,

I think that would rule out the TLRs, as well as the RB67 and most larger cameras.

If you are going to shoot both, I think that limits you to the 645s with some kind of internal metering. I have used the Mamiya 645, and it is a good system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When MF started is was a childs format; ie the Brownie format. Later in the 1930's it became a TLR format; a radical machine for sports. Later it came mainstream for newswork; the Medalist of WW2; then more common for portraits. I used a TLR in High School to shoot sports; or an Exakta slr. Later with a wedding chap we used a TLR for candids; and the 4x5 for formals. Before the instamatic/kodapak came out about 1963; the Brownie format was used by the masses for everyday shots with box cameras. With 220 at about 1965 one could shoot without reloading as much with weddings. After instamatics became mainstream the general public dropped their box cameras and MF became more for advanced amateurs and pros. For B&W usage MF makes a fine negative; for color work many of us have seen our local labs die of over a decade ago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...