Jump to content

no lens creep at local store


justin_ngo

Recommended Posts

I have checked and tested the Nikon 18-200mmm at a local store at my area (

Missouri, US). The lens is great,(I think it much much better than the 2 kits

lens for the same settings), the zoom is very solid and especialy, DOES NOT

CREEP ! I tried to hold it vertically,up & down, try do make the zoom draw back

or extend at various ranges but it did not!

 

The only thing is that the price included tax is $US 800 ($ 120 more than well-

known stores in NY included shipping).

 

Does non-creeping worth the different amount? Should I get the copy at the

local store or take a try at B&H ( which I'm not sure that I will get a non-

creeping copy) ????

 

I would greatly appreciated your advice.

 

Best regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for all your advices. I did not know that the lens will creep when getting aged, even it does not creep when new.You all saved my $. Very helpful.Thanks a lot!!

I will order a copy from BH and hope they will give me a very good one.

 

Cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck, don't sell it just because it might creep. If the optical performance is good enough, keep it.

 

My 70-210/2.8-4 Vivitar Series 1 zoom creeps. But I couldn't buy a better equivalent zoom for the money ($60 at a pawn shop about 10 years ago).

 

Both copies of the 28-90 Series 1 varifocal creeped, OM and Canon FD mounts. Only reason I sold 'em was because I switched to Nikon. Excellent lenses for the money.

 

The 35-70/2.8D AF Nikkor can creep, tho' not badly. It's way too good to worry about a minor problem like a little creeping. And the overall barrel length doesn't change much, so it's no big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Lex... I'm just joking. I'm ordering one copy from BH after I were very impressive about its optical performance. I hope I will get a good copy. The copy at my local store was very good, I think. However the price+tax is much more higher.

At a local store, I took a couple sample pictures with : Nikkor 18-200, Tamron 18-200, Tamron 17-50mm f 2.8.

The result: Nikkor 18-200 was very little less sharper than the Tamron f2.8 but far more sharper than Tamron 18-200. ( setting at f3.5 and 17/18mm)

I think Nikon 18-200 is sharper than 18-55non-VR and 55-200VR I owned before. I think VR II is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...