Jump to content

300/4 AFS + TC-14EII & TC-17EII test shots


paul.droluk

Recommended Posts

Having just acquired the 300/4-AFS, TC-14EII & TC-17EII, I performed the following comparison... the

TC-14EII versus upsizing x 1.4, and the TC-17EII versus upsizing x 1.7. All tripod mounted, mirror up,

f5.6, ISO 200 on a D300. These are 100% crops from the in camera JPEG files. Smart sharpened (0.8, 30)

just prior to Saving for Web. The subject was a bed sheet, about 250 meters away (through a neighboring

apartment window). The TC's performed very well... clearly sharper and cleaner than upsized versions,

especially the 1.7x.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't take shots of my neighbours' sheets when we lived in Chengde.

But then I also didn't have a 300/4 and TC14EII with me. My longest lens then was a 180/2.8.

 

Your results are similar to mine with the same set up

(300/4 AFS + TC14E). f7 with the TC looked about as good to me

as f5 without. Of course this was film, an F3 and F100 and through

a Schneider loupe. I looked long and hard.

 

After I returned home and scanned the film (Kodak positive) into TIFs

the results were the same at 100%. I could go beyond this, but why would I?

 

I sure miss Chengde and the people and the leeks drying out on the

balconies and window sills . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...