alain_martinez Posted December 26, 2007 Share Posted December 26, 2007 Hello, I've been contemplating switching to continuous lighting for "some" of myportrait work. Particularly for boudoir pictures where is very important tohide, and show certain things. I'd like the WYSIWYG approach of continuouslighting. My question for those of you who are shooting with these lights iswhat ISOs are you shooting at? What apertures are shooting at? I just don'twant to get these lights and then having to shoot at ISO 1600 and 2.8. Howabout gelling these lights, is it a mission warming up these lights with gels? Any other good or bad experiences with these lights? Thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesse_starks Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I have a TD-5 with a Halo light modifier and using florescent you'll have to have the light close to your subject and have a wide aperture as well. In their defense they produce a very soft light with the Halo. Tungsten offers a little more light, but more heat. I haven't tried it with flash yet and I think it may be the best option for it's intended purpose. It could work using continuous lighting (florescent or tungsten) provided your subject can sit still for a 1/15 to 1/40 second exposure. Jesse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now