leo_grillo Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 I am doing my own MF film/digital/scanning lab tests (landscapes) and it's getting quite expensive. I wonder if I am reinventing the wheel -- or if there is a lab out there that has already made these samples: 39MP digital capture, MF negative and transparency capture, all the same subject/time/light, etc. Then wet print the negative, scan & print the transparency, and print the digital -- side by side comparisons. Ideally, these would be samples of the lab's best work. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek_stanton2 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 I haven't yet used them, but have a look at www.westcoastimaging.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leo_grillo Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 Thanks Derek -- they never did such a test either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikoruser Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 Leo contact Duggal Labs, they will be answer any question you might have, expect to pay top dollar for state of the art quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leo_grillo Posted February 3, 2008 Author Share Posted February 3, 2008 Update on my landscape testing of format and film vs digital capture: To date: here is the heirarchy of resolution, dynamic and tonal range based upon my eyeballing the WCI results so far. I had WCI prepare for 30x40 prints, but actually print an 11x14 test area, same in all photos. Chromira glossy prints (think Lightjet). 1. H3D w/negative film (Winner so far, but second to 8x10 neg film expected.) 2. H3D w/39MP back (Will shoot it along with film back in same body -- for computer checks of expected results on film.) 3. 8x10 w/Provia (Res fine, but tonal and dynamic range not great -- digital capture better. Still out, and probably the best reuslt, is 8x10 negative film.) 4. H3D w/Provia (No where near the 8x10 in resolution, and same range problems.) 5. Mamiya7 with same neg and pos film stock. (Lack of absolute framing and RF focusing made it the least reliable, making H3D smaller film format a better choice.) 6. Negative optical prints the old fashioned way ... the worst in sharpness, resolution and fine detail, but good dynamic and tonal range. Dead last among my preferances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now