arond a. Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Is it normal to expect that 1/4 of shots will be improperly focussed when using the 21mm DA AF? I realize manual focus is an option, but I would hope by this late date camera manufacturers could have most of the kinks worked out in this area. Is it the lens or the camera or me? Would a different lens respond differently? I don't recall this ever being a problem w/ my previous dslr with its comparable focal length lens. Specifically, this camera has difficulty locking onto subjects in the foreground, especially when within a meter of the lens. What is going on here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_mermagen1 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 How many focus points are you using? What is the subject in the foreground and how close is it? Most AF cameras I've tried cannot lock in on objects that don't have color contrast or texture. For example, if my focus point was on the green open space of a tennis court, it wouldn't lock. If the focus point were at the edge of a white line on the green court, it would lock. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william-porter Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Arond, Over on the Pentax Forums site (pentaxforums.com), you should search for this issue. I am pretty sure -- but not 100% sure, so check for yourself -- that early in the summer Ben Kanarek had a backfocusing or some kind of focusing problem with one of these lenses. I've heard others say that this is a fantastic lens, indeed, that seems to be the consensus. But you might have one that has problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakon_soreide Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Doesn't the camera tell you in some way if it fails to focus on the focus point you are using? I've not used the Pentax myself, but basically every camera I've ever owned has some sort of indication whether it is in focus before you shoot.<p> And, if the autofocus finds something to focus on, then - no - you should not expect a quarter of your shots to come out unfocussed. Unless you're using long shutter speeds and are experiencing motion blur instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc2imaging Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 I've got a few comments for you, but I'll start of by assuming you are talking about a focus issue not a motion blur issue... 1. You say that it is a particular problem when focusing on subjects close to the camera. My wife had a similar issue once when she first got her Tamron 28-200mm on her ZX-50. The problem was that this particular lens has a minimum focus length of 4 feet, so when she was trying to focus on things that were on the edge of her range, the camera would have a freakout session. 2. I like to make my intern get detail shots with a 50mm f1.4 to make him practice his focusing skills. More than once he has come back and said, 'the camera won't focus' or something to that effect. To this I say, 'MAKE the camera focus.' It can't read your mind, that's why we don't use P'N'S cameras. Sometimes you have to take control and actually tell the camera what you want. 3. When using AF, the body decides when focus is achived optically. This means that if the shutter fired, the camera thought SOMETHING was in focus (whether or not the PROPER something was in focus is between you and the camera). Now, unless something moved between the time that the camera saw focus and the shutter actually released (which is always possible), if absoulutely nothing is in focus in 1/4 of your shots, I would be more worried about the camera than the lens. All of that said, it is really a judgement on the skill of the shooter and the subject being shot. If I were to go shoot a basketball game with my 50mm f1.4 with the lens wide open, I would expect at least half of the shots to be out of focus, AF or MF, because of the shallow DOF and the fast motion. On the other hand, if I'm in the studio shooting an adult who is sitting still on a stool while using the same lens at f11, I would expect 100% of the shots to be in focus. Do you have another body to try the lens on? Do you have another lens to try on the body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kuhne Posted November 5, 2007 Share Posted November 5, 2007 At such close focus distance, even with a wide angle lens as 21mm, depth of field is significantly reduced. All areas in the frame are not likely to be sharp. Point of focus then becomes a critical issue, especially at wider apertures. Switching camera to center-only focus sensor is advised for selective focussing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now