Jump to content

More photos from the Retina


icog

Recommended Posts

Hey everybody,

 

just got the second roll back and wanted to share. I'm really enjoying using

the Retina but find I need more practice using the viewfinder when working

close.

 

Mixing sulfites<a

href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/15466988@N05/1714166950/" title="Photo

Sharing"><img

src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2150/1714166950_b96d71c00a.jpg" width="338"

height="500" alt="Helping the Fermentation" /></a>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last one. This one from in front <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/15466988@N05/1714121568/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2249/1714121568_973a1b9e9a.jpg" width="500" height="338" alt="Fall Reds in front of the Galt Library" /></a>of the local library. Everyone is commenting on the vivid reds of the foilage this year. Normally fall colors run from yellow to orange with a little dull red. This year the reds are brilliant almost new england like.

Thanks for taking the time to look. Any comments are welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lionel,

 

Retinas are great! What kind of Retina have you been using for these photos?

 

I have taken several thousend photos with IIIc, some also with Ia. IIIc with all possible attachements. The picture quality (resolution, contrast, distortions) is first class but clearly different if compared for example Canon L series fixed focal lenses. You see it easy when projecting cromes with high quality projector & lens (Leitz Colorplan). Still the difference is difficult to describe or explain. I am shure several photo.net members have the same experience. What is the difference and it's explanation?

 

Wondering Kerkko K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lionel, thank you for sharing your Retina photos.

 

Kerkko,

 

I think it is the coatings. Retina lenses are single coated (bloomed) and the Canon lenses have many coatings. Whilst coatings aid contrast and reduce internal veiling flare, by the very act of increasing the contrast, they loose some 'subtlety' in the shadow areas and edges can look over-defined. Whilst I have and enjoy some of the the top Nikon gear, I find my Retina is getting more use than ever recently. The photos have 'that special something' that keeps me coming back for more. Seeing a good optically printed photo or a clean transparency from a Retina 50mm f2 is a good photographic experience indeed.

 

Enjoy your Retina,

 

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian,

 

Thank you of your view to the difference. You made a good point. On the other hand I have also been using Rolleiflex 2,8 F and 2,8 GX and the difference is clearly more marginal if at all existing. Also I have never taken that much photos with 2,8 F than with Retina. Any other thoughts?

 

Kerkko K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be so long getting back. It's a Ia from 1951 with a 2.8 Xenar.

I hadn't noticed the pastel colors before Jim thanks for pointing that out. Things are just as I saw them. The winery is painted in large blocks of color in just the shades you see. Kind of a pastel weekend I guess.

I was using my normal film, consumer grade Fuji 400. No post processing, I don't currently have the abilities (hardware, software nor skills) to do such things.

Thanks for your interest and comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...