kcrisp Posted April 9, 2001 Share Posted April 9, 2001 Has anyone tried an older (1967) G Claron 240mm lens with 8X10 film? If so, does it cover and is there any room for movements? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pemongillo Posted April 9, 2001 Share Posted April 9, 2001 There is a ton of lens info on this website. Check this out. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~qtluong/photography/lf/lenseslist.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian_ellis3 Posted April 10, 2001 Share Posted April 10, 2001 I use a 210 mm G Claron for 8x10. Although its specs would indicate that it doesn't cover 8x10, in fact it does when stopped down to F 22 or smaller. I'm not much of a lens technical type but my understanding is that the G Claron design is of a type that results in gradually increasing coverage as the lens is stopped down so that at F 22 it reaches 8x10 coverage and as you go smaller the ooverage continues to increase so that at F 45 or 64 there's room for a good bit of movement. I would assume the same is true of the 240 and that it would cover 8x10 with room sto spare at smaller apertures but I don't know for sure. I've been very pleased with the 210 - small, light, and very sharp at least with the contact prints I make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william_marderness1 Posted April 10, 2001 Share Posted April 10, 2001 I have used this lens for 8x10. It covers and there is room forlimited movements. I found myself running out of image circle, so Iswitched to a 270mm G-claron, which I am happier with. It has enoughcoverage, and I don't mind the longer lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now