RaymondC Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Hi, I am planning MF for a diff way of photog (and also LF). Currently I am shooting 35mm and digital SLR. I like the fast aperture lenses and wondering for a Nikon 200/2 or the Canon 200/1.8 what sort of image can I gather in medium format. I like the limited depth. Given that lenses are longer in MF and the film size/sensor is larger what is the result of that? In particular I am foreseeing a Mamiya RB67. I find I don't shoot a lot so a roll of 120 can be lesser than a 35mm roll. It could be a good investment than on a lens that cost $4000. I don't do action much at all, its really just the bokeh, limited depth I am after. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_j Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Depends what you are looking for. If you want medium format with equivalent angle of view to your 200mm on 35mm film, then you need about a 320mm in 645 format and 400mm in a 6x7 like the Mamiya RB67. However those lenses (if available) are going to be f/4 or more. Pentax do a 300mm f/4 for their 645. <p> If you simply wish to experiment with narrow dof and aren't too worried about angle of view, then you could consider a 645 with a 150mm f/2.8. e.g. Pentax 645 - 150mm f/2.8. But you are going to have to be about 1/2 the distance from your subject than with your 200mm on 35mm format. <p> Take a look at the dof calculator here:<br> <a href="http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html">http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html</a> <p> Use the calculator with the following:<br> 35mm film, 200mm, f/2, 10 metres distance.<br> 6x4.5 film, 150mm, f/2.8, 5 metres distance.<br> <p> Quite similar results don't you think?<br> Note however that the calculations are quite sensitive to distance. <p> You could purchase quite a decent medium format kit including fast 150mm (or similar) for the cost of one of those 200mm f/2 lenses. <p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marek_fogiel Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 RB67 is basically a tripod camera. Take it into consideration, as it limits the type of photography you want to do. If you want narrow dof high quality photography, and slow down a bit using film, then a Leica or Zeiss Ikon RF with some of the best lenses will give you quite unique types of shots. If you want to stick with MF, I think the Hasselblad F lens line ( for the 200 and 2000 series cameras)has some unbeatable optics for narrow dof, and this kit is much lighter than Mamiya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georg_s1 Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 I have used the Hasselblad 2000 FCM with the Tele-Tessar 4/250 and this surprisingly light lens has a really narrow dof. Even the fat and heavy Distagon 2,8/50 will isolate the subject if focused close - nice for smaller sculptures and other small things. Excuse my funny english, Georg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mag_miksch Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 <i>..RB67 is basically a tripod camera...</i><br>Why you write such a nonsense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now