rick_helmke Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I understand the NFL has a new dress code for accredited photographers. Apparently everyone will be required to wear a red vest with Canon and Adidas logos on them. Even the Nikon shooters. Nothing a Sharpie won't fix I suppose. Hell I thought NASCAR was bad, and it is. Can we say 'bought and paid for'?? Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Laur Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Well, it's not like the NFL was founded by Mother Theresa. It's a business with absolutely nothing to sell except image and excitement... so, putting a piece of that image up for sale isn't exactly shocking. It's how (and why) they exist as a big organization. Even so, this is why I stick to sports where the color you have to wear (blaze orange) isn't to advertise anybody's wares - it's so you don't catch a face full of birdshot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timzeipekis Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Unless your on an outing with the Vice President! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_auer2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 I think it is actually Canon and Rebok...rebock... They are not suppose to be big logos. The problem is they are red and you will stand out more than the past photo vests made you stand out. Before, the less photogs were seen the better, so photo vests were very similar to the surounding area, green or blue and blended in with the turf or the padded walls of the arena so when TV swung around you would just dissapear into the suroundings. Now, you will stick out and be very noticable. The problem is, we need photo vests. I do not know how many times my credential tag has gotten tangled up a camera strap or flipped over or hidden by my jacket that I would have to readjust to move around. Wearing a vest, while not a great fashion statement, is a great idea. Problem is, while teams have money, it is much cheaper to have regular credentials printed than to have vests done for each game. By out sourcing the costs to Nike, Rebock, Canon, Nikon, etc, it saves the league money, so for the league it is a good idea. Look at the photowells at some of the stadiums. On the outside they may have a logo for a company sponsor or something. If newspapers or photographers have a problem with it, they do not have to cover the games and that opens the field for more wireservices and freelancers who could care less. Now, that all changes if you are in position to take a shot and a NFL guy comes over and says, "If you are going to shoot from here, can you turn more this way so we can see the vest logos in our camera?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_smith20 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 If anyone has a big enough complaint about the vest that they want to have me wear it for them, please feel free to send the vest and credential to me. :-). I'd love to dodge footballs and NFL officials on the sidelines some Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilsontsoi Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 <a href="http://www.sportsshooter.com/news_story.html?id=1807">Here's</a> some feedback from few others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajpn Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 It is Rebok and the vests are safety orange. Not red. This is rumored to be part of the deal that allows Nolan and that other coach to wear Rebok suits at home games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now