shaun_carter Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 here's a photo from today's wedding that i'm strugging with whether or not to tone down the highlights in the dress. i'd like a few opinions on whether the dress is blown out or not. would you leave as is or fix it? thanks...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlad khavin Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Personally, I would bring the highlights down a bit. I wouldn't call it blown, but... you can't really see detail in the front of the dress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlad khavin Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Addendum: I wouldn't overdo the highlight recovery on it though. Just enough to show a little more detail in the front of the dress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Tone it down slightly. I think the whole picture is 1/3 stop too bright. Try that fix before any localised fixed. Maybe you could keep the skin tones the same. I might merge two layers to hold the skin. Another possibility is a luminosity mask, and then invert it so yu can tone down the light areas and keep the skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Don`t invert the luminosity mask. Apply to a dup layer, then make a curves adjustment layer pulling the curve to lower right. Flatten layers.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_schilling___chicago_ Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 The front of the dress and the outside edge of the tux are blown...here's a quick retouch with PS to bring some details to the dress and tux along with a subtle viginette.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Then a little burn around the edges<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun_carter Posted July 8, 2007 Author Share Posted July 8, 2007 I agree, it looks better with some work on the highlights. Nice fix Ron and Dave. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_rubinstein___mancheste1664880652 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 If you are using CS3 or LR then the highlight recovery tool was practically made for this. I can't understand how I managed without it, changed the way I expose, I don't have to be so protective of the whites anymore, I can expose for the faces and pull the whites back slightly in the RAW converter for loads of DR throughout the image without making it look flat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now