Jump to content

New Voigtlander 28mm & 50mm Lenses


Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any first hand experience with either of these new lenses yet - in particular the 28? I believe they had been scheduled to debut this month. Based on some earlier threads - it sounded like these lenses, released along w/ the R-2 body, are to have more substantial build, quality, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.

 

<p>

 

I have seen portraits taken with both and they are WONDERFUL, leaving

nothing to any lens. Prints 12x18 were razor sharp all over, and the

colour rendition was neutral, as far as I could see from the

lighting. Very little if any discernable barrel distortion in the 28

and it is FAST.

 

<p>

 

For the money they looked good enough that I was tempted to trade my

M6 and 50 & 35 mm Summicrons on the spot for both of them and a Bessa

2 body with grip and winder.

 

<p>

 

The reason I didn't was mainly that the dealer acquiessed instantly,

not asking any money in addition. That told me he could do that and

make money selling the Leica kit, so I hesitated. I can not justify

the Leica outfit AND the CV lenses, so I was able to resisit the

temptation of the sparkling new toys.

 

<p>

 

Cheers

 

BTW, CV has an amazing book with all of the CV cameras, lenses and

accessories listed, but sadly I saw it only in Japanese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen the Japanese Voigtlander site with the 50mm 2.5 but no

evidence of a 28mm 3.5 as yet. A compact 28mm will be a big hit with

RF users who are not too bothered about low light performance and

I'll be buying one as soon as it hits the shops as the 1.9 is just a

bit on the large size. Come to think of it my 50 F2 summicron is not

exactly compact - I may buy the 50 as well if it's signifigantly

shorter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Richard - I believe that P. was asking about the new CV lenses, the

50/2.5 and the 28/3.5, both new, high quality designs that are built

using much more substantial construction than any of the previous CV

lenses except the LE 50/3.5 collapsible Heliar. The new lenses come

in both black paint and a new high-quality chrome.)

 

<p>

 

P.

 

<p>

 

The 50/2.5's are shipping now from Stephen Gandy in the US, and as

posted, the 28/3.5 is expected in 1-2 months. I'd be surprised if

any photos have been seen from the 28/3.5, but the 50/2.5 has been in

many shooters' hands for a while in Japan and through special early-

access programs.

 

<p>

 

I asked Tom A. about his experience with the 50/2.5 and the reports

came back glowing. He was particularly impressed with the build

quality and the finish quality. I believe that his comment was that

it looked exactly like something that Leica would have produced. For

me, the proof was that it was that the new lens had supplanted his

50/2 Summicron as his normal lens; and he said that it compared very

favorabley or even better to the Leica lens.

 

<p>

 

I can't wait. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 28mm looks to have the same barrel as the 21 and the 25mm VCs.

Pity it is not f2.8, but perhaps they would need a new barrel. The

50mm looks good, but I would still prefer a Summicron (it is a half

stop faster) unless the VC is significantly smaller. It does not look

as though it is. Still the 50mm will be an excellent lens for those

who cannot put up with the large Nokton and want a screw mount lens at

a cheaper price.

Robin Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<< sorry for my ignorance. but are these lenses finally mad in m-

mount or still screw? with now two m-mount bodies in the line cosina

should start to make proper m-mount lenses. >>>

 

<p>

 

For non-SLR's, Cosina/Voigtlander only makes LTM (screw-mount)

lenses, no M-mounts. (They have adapted three of the lenses to the

Nikon/Contax RF mount: 21, 25, 35)

 

<p>

 

This discussion has gone round-and-round on the CVUG. Why would CV

want to make M-mount lenses? I can't find any reason. It would:

 

<p>

 

1. Increase their inventory, distribution, and mfg expenses

2. Increase their dealers' inventory requirements and thus expenses

3. Complicate their catalog

4. Raise their prices, as they'd probably have to revise the tooling

5. Makes their line of lenses and bodies partially incompabible with

each other.

 

<p>

 

If they don't do it, they can:

 

<p>

 

1. Offer one lens line

2. Sell the adapters separately, keeping their selling prices as low

as possible (this is also a rationale for selling their nice hoods

separately). And they probably make a good profit on these doo-dads.

3. Allow especially frugal users to buy a minimal set of adapters if

they so choose.

4. Provides maximum flexibility for the users of their lenses as they

can go on all the CV bodies, Leica LTM/M bodies, and all the LTM

bodies made since the 1930's worldwide.

 

<p>

 

So now, why would CV make M-Mount lenses for the few of us who clamor

for them?

 

<p>

 

Skip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...