gerald_wallace Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 (My search didn't find an answer to my specific question). I recently cleaned my 5D and 20D (and my wife's XT) filter/sensor using Eclipse and PEC pads. After the cleaning I read where Eclipse II should be usd on the 5D (not Eclipse). Could I potentially harm the filter/sensor if I continue to use the Eclipse instead of using Eclipse II for cleaning the 5D - is the difference a marketing ploy only? Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_nordling1 Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 Wether or not it is a marketing ploy I can not tell, but according to the specifications Eclipse is pure metanol and Exlipse II is a mixture of metanol, etanol and propanol. If metanol where dangerous why include it in the new formula? /Daniel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosvanEekelen Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 I expect that there are 2 versions of the Eclipse liquid for a good reason. OTOH both liquids consist basically of low molecular weight alcohols so I don't expect any immediate damage. Note to Daniel: the solubility in the alcohol mixture can be different from that of pure methanol. By making the mix less polar it can be much safer for the sensor/filter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_baker4 Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 I believe that the E2 has been designed for new TIN OXIDE Coated Sensors, so it is really designed for owners of Sony A100 and Canon 400D SLR's. But I believe that the E2 may be used with conventional CMOS/CCD sensors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_rowe Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 I don't remember where I saw this but there was a user recently who documented damaged to his 5D AA filter while cleaning the sensor. Apparently there is some kind of metal copper-like coating that is on the 5D AA filter that is present on others like the 20D. He used the corner edge of the cleaning spatula to clean a stubborn spot and wiped off some of the metal coating -- the damage was clearly visible in the photograph. He was adamant that he applied very little pressure and was experienced in cleaning sensors. As I remember the quote from Canon required a new senor assembly. Not trying to scare you but this person sounded experienced and knowledge - just not about the relatively fragile surface of the 5D AA-filter. I think this is certainly worth more detailed research on your behalf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeet_sukumaran1 Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 There certainly seems to be a lot of confusion and misinformation regarding this issue. Some Canon cameras, such as the 5D or the 1D Mk III, have their dichroic hot mirror surface directly exposed on the front of the sensor assembly. On other cameras, this tin oxide coating is on the reverse side of the initial glass element, or there is another layer of glass on top of it, so it is not exposed to normal wet cleaning. There appeared to have been at least one case where wet cleaning a camera with an exposed hot mirror configuration (a 5D) with the original Eclipse solution seems to have damaged, dissolved or otherwise removed at least some of this coating: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1032&message=22111367&changemode=1 For a while, it was strongly advocated to only use the new E2 solution to clean sensors with a coating on the front, as this had been formulated so as to not dissolve the tin oxide coating. However, since then, the president of Photographic Solutions has been looking into this, collecting information on exactly which cameras were damaged by which solution, and concluded that both Eclipse and E2 were safe to use on all sensors, and both were equally effective, but E2 was less likely to dissolve the tin oxide or other sensitive coatings: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1032&thread=22929248 So what damaged the 5D sensor? I dunno, but I'm sticking to E2 for my 5D. -- jeet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgpix Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 I was unaware of his issue until looking at this thread. As I recently cleaned my 5D sensor/filter with Eclipse (no damage that I am aware of), I did some Googling. Here's a compatibility chart that suggests Eclipse is fine for the 5D. I make no guarantees of its accuracy or authority, though! http://www.photosol.com/cameras_bymfg.html Simnon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerald_wallace Posted April 28, 2007 Author Share Posted April 28, 2007 Thanks to you all for trying to help with this potential problem. Jeet and Simon, thanks for pointing me towards Photographic Solutions President David Stone,I will be watching the results of his survey. I don't have a need to clean my 5D very often (I use my 20D about one-third of the time)so perhaps we can find a credible answer to this issue before my next filter cleaning task. Again, thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeet_sukumaran1 Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 I have been informed by David Stone of Photographic Solutions that Eclipse is the solution to use for the Canon 5D. E2 will also work, but ONLY if you have a recently-produced unit (as in the past few months); there is a possibility that E2 will damage earlier units, due to some inconsistencies in the filter coatings. Unfortunately, there is no way to tell from the serial # which category your camera falls into. So I guess Eclipse is the safe bet. Anyone want an unused bottle of E2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_stone2 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 While it has taken way longer than I had hoped, I can finally say we have resolved the issues surrounding Eclipse, E2 and 5D cameras. It is too long to post here, so please follow this link : http://www.photosol.com/e25d.htm Thanx to all of you for your patience ! David M. Stone, President PHOTOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS, INC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now