Jump to content

A true story not so hard to believe!


Recommended Posts

I had posted this on another forum but thought it might be of interest to all

Leicaficionatos here, so here it is:

 

One night at my local camera club's meeting I pulled out my old M3 fitted with

a 50mm Summicron. An old timer stepped over to take a closer look and said

something revealing, it seemed to me. He said he had the same lens in his Leica

outfit, and that his son, who worked for a well known Japanese camera company,

was repeatedly asked to bring his dad's lens in to work, ostensibly to make

comparisons against. Sort of adds meaning to the phrase "setting the standard".

 

That camera company name starts with a big N....but that's all you'll get out

of me. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leica true-believers will believe just about anything. Including that that a major corporation can't afford a lens costing a few hundred dollars and must do their testing based on some random sample borrowed from an employee.

 

I have this really nice bridge over the East River in New York and I was wondering if you'd be interested in making an investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that (if this fairly up to date Nikon brochure is to be believed) Nikon have their own glass works making 200 different types of glass.....

 

http://www.nikonimaging.com/global/products/lens/pdf/nikkor_lenses_36p.pdf

 

(see page 3)

 

Why would they be wanting to know (after 50+ years) how to make a Summicron? Even assuming this is true then I am sure they can buy some themselves and take one apart and measure everything and do some sort of spectrographic analysis to tell them what is in the glass and in what proportions. Better still I expect someone at Leica would tell them if they asked. There is a lot of free exchange of information between technical folk. So long as the necessary patents are in place there is no harm in revealing stuff like this. I am sure Nikon are not about to launch a bunch of M mount lenses anyday soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come on guys....

 

It may be a story, but it may be true. I think everyone needs to remember the subtlety of situations.

 

Sure anyone can buy a lens to dissect and analyze. But do you want to make it public?

 

Scenario 1:

 

You are one of the top engineers of, well, anything. You are working on problems, you have ideas, wants, etc...

 

Suddenly something comes to your head while viewing a colleague's famous Leica lens...

 

...so you begin to think more about whatever your idea, goal, or thought/problem is/was and this item becomes more and more a part of the project (off the record of course, and between engineers/researchers on the same project...)

 

 

You people think any company wants it on record that they are spending $1 on another make/models equip. to research instead of their own development idea or *original* creation?!

 

Shame on you all!

 

You wanna buy *anything* receipts, invoices, etc *ALL* must be created...

 

And the ore people in on it the more people talk and secrets get out...jeezus...look at the CIA for heavens sake these days...

 

 

It happens all the time in engineering, architecture, design, advertising, etc...

 

A very believable story. Who knows..

 

regards

C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cebes I'm not sure if I follow your logic. NASA picked the Omega Speedmaster watch for

use in space by going to a local jeweler and buying watches off the shelf. Omega didn't

even know that their watch was chosen until well after the fact.

 

Just because Joe Smith goes into a store to buy a watch or in the case Joe Sato goes into a

lens store to buy a Leica lens doesn't mean that he's the person who works for Nikon.

 

Chad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and as I understand it, half were disassembled for evaluation and study and the other half were restored and used as a basis for comparison. A friend of mine worked for GM and said they bought one of pretty much every car made, anywhere in the world, for evaluation purposes and ultimately ended up disassembling and/or crushing them afterwards.

 

Reverse engineering is a common practice in other engineering disciplines so why should the camera industry be any different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff, M14 Elites? If so, what barbarians the Mazdas are.

 

Were you perhaps thinking Elans? If so, Mazda learned nothing from the exercise. The Miata doesn't have backbone chassis, doesn't have Herald front suspensions, ... It does look a little like an uglier wider Elan, though.

 

Cheers,

 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reverse engineering worked, um, in a certain way for the manufacturer of the Escalade and the Avalanche: Ask any shareholder :-)

 

While the Elite was a thrilling object, its engineering didn't rival anything from Mazda, least of all the Miata. It handled beautifully for hours at a time and left a small parts trail as it zipped fitfully along, as was expected of proper English machines.

 

I believe the truth is that the Miata design team kept an Elite and an Austin Healey in their LOS ANGELES studio, along with some other beauties...simply for inspiration. They didn't use them for engineering studies, they just loved the curves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Leica true-believers will believe just about anything." You said a true mouthful OP. Urban legends are born every day. Did you know that NASA borrowed a Sputnik in the middle of the night to reverse engineer our first space flight. SHHHH no one is supposed to know!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Did you know that NASA borrowed a Sputnik in the middle of the night to reverse engineer

our first space flight. "

 

That is totally wrong, our knowledge of space travel came from Roswell NM, along with the

microwave oven and DVD player the aliens had on board the UFO.

 

Chad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeffrey - "A friend of mine worked for GM and said they bought one of pretty much every car made, anywhere in the world, for evaluation purposes and ultimately ended up disassembling and/or crushing them afterwards."

 

That's actually understating it. Back in my GM days, I was at Cadillac's engineering center at Clark and Scotten, on the Allante project. Our group had its own "fleet" of "supercars" for evaluation, including two Lamborghini Countachs (or whatever is the plural of Countach) and the just released Ferrari Testarossa, a Maserati Biturbo, a Calloway Corvette, a Lancia Delta (ugliest thing in the fleet), and several others that I've forgotten. So I was fresh out of Laurence Tech, with a brand new BSEE, and learned to drive stick on a Lamborghini Countach.

 

Man, there was nothing in the world like Detroit in the 80s.

 

And the end result of all that was a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...