schopke Posted March 17, 2002 Share Posted March 17, 2002 Please let me know what you think. After my last posting I thought I would give this photo critique one more try. It is fun for me to photograph. So view the image and let me know your thoughts. <p> <img src="http://www.leica-gallery.net/photo-lib/image/large/mormon-pioneer-25694.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_smith12 Posted March 17, 2002 Share Posted March 17, 2002 Rob, <p> Underexposed, shadows on the chest distracting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_horn Posted March 17, 2002 Share Posted March 17, 2002 Rob- Try some fill-in flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F. Posted March 17, 2002 Share Posted March 17, 2002 Rob: I love this shot. Lots of interesting stuff to look at. Varnish, glass, putty, nails! Your selection of subject is great, composition is fine. I just want to see into the shadows, so I won't miss anything. Please shoot it over and cut the development time by 30 to 40%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfie wang Posted March 17, 2002 Share Posted March 17, 2002 Slightly underexposed on the signs with too much shadows on the facade. Nice composition although moving closer would have helped. <p> By the way, I have to say that I love the subject of Mormon town. Being probably the only Mormon Leica photog around here it's nice to know that we get some props too... <p> alfie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F. Posted March 18, 2002 Share Posted March 18, 2002 Oops. I meant, "Please shoot it over and increase the exposure, while cutting the development time (etc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iván Posted March 18, 2002 Share Posted March 18, 2002 Hi, Rob: <p> It is a nicely done photo but still the above advices could be useful, of course. <p> My real problem is that I wasn't able to pinpoint the real subject of this photo and my eyes kept looking around and all over searching for the main item the photo is about. A case of "more is less", perhaps ? <p> I have several <a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo? photo_id=641224&size=lg">photos</a> where the same syndrome is all too evident (aside from poor exposure in this case), so that I tend to be oversensitive to it. <p> Regards, Rob <p> -Iván Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheridan Posted March 18, 2002 Share Posted March 18, 2002 Hello Rob. A very good counter play of shapes, shadows and textures. Centre top white post a minor distraction which appears to cut into the composition and accentuate the upper left darker area.Not ever having posted any images I cannot say positively, but I think the original print would show better shadow detail.A classic shot.Regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot Posted March 18, 2002 Share Posted March 18, 2002 I like the antique (brown) look, I don't know whether this was deliberate, but it works. But to me, the main problem is it just looks like a photo of some old chests and boxes, and I don't know what more to make of it. More shadow detail wouldn't change that impression. In other words, no partiuclar story or feelings (other than that of time past). A good photo nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now