Jump to content

Critique - Leica or non-Leica Image?????


schopke

Recommended Posts

This Ford was parked outside the train depot in Virginia City. I was intrigued by the look of the building and the Ford. I tend to like abstractions of a scene. Taking just a piece of the station and a section of the Ford I felt the image told more of the story...leaving the details of the story behind the story to the viewer.

 

<p>

 

I shoot with a Leica, with a Hasselblad, and with a large format KBCanham. Can anybody tell if this was indeed taken with my Leica and how can you tell? Please tell me what you think about the photo also.

 

<p>

 

 

<img src="http://www.leica-gallery.net/photo-lib/image/large/ford-25144.jpg">

 

<p>

 

Thanks all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spotting a "Leica" or other brand image on the web relies on clues

like knowing what lenses have a pentagonal iris. The resolution and

bit depth of web images is a big limiting factor. If the target

display is the web, a Leica is gross overkill 99% of the time.<P>

FWIW the 21mm f/4.0 Super-Angulon-R has a 4-blade diaphragm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Rob:

 

<p>

 

No easy task. I guess if it had been a MF camera the degree of detail

had been somewhat higher but then Douglas is certainly right: hard to

say based on a screen image . . .

 

<p>

 

But <a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?

photo_id=618886&size=lg">this one</a> IS a Leica photo. In fact one

of the first ones I made with my first M3.

 

<p>

 

Regards, Rob. Good photo, of course, no matter what it was shot with.

 

<p>

 

-Iván

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...