ralf_j. Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 Ok, I figured I'd try this experiment last weekend. I took a 620 spool and 35mm film in it with 120 saved backing paper. I tried to keep the film as centered as possible. I loaded with it my Kodak Vollenda 6x9 which has a 10.5cm 4.5 Zeiss Tessar lens and took it out for a spin hoping to get some nice panoramas. After developing the negatives, I found out that the framing was totally off. I thought that the 10.5cm lens on this camera would be a simple 105mm short zoom on 35mm film so I tried to compensate but was still off; what is the equivalent focal length on 35mm film? Here are some pics of the camera and a couple of results. Thanks.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralf_j. Posted December 28, 2006 Author Share Posted December 28, 2006 Front standard close up:<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralf_j. Posted December 28, 2006 Author Share Posted December 28, 2006 My 2 year old, always running off the frame:<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralf_j. Posted December 28, 2006 Author Share Posted December 28, 2006 Woman and child walking toward the ocean shore. Heavy overcast day, with really poor light didn't help much...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_gilday Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Ralf; The 105mm lens *would* be a short zoom with 35mm film - if you were shooting a regular 35mm frame! With panoramic formats, the concept of equivelant lengths and formats becomes increasingly meaningless. As it is, you're going to get a picture the full length (~84mm, probably) of the 6x9 negative, but only around 1/4 the width. If you had, for example, the 35mm film perfectly centered on the roll, it would be easy enough to mask off the original viewfinder, and see more-or-less what you're going to get... The cheater's way to go, of course, is simply to shoot 120 film, and crop heavily on the top and bottom; voila, instant panorama. :D That method, though, loses a lot of the fun of your approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minhnguyen9113 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Hi Ralf<p> Here's the Kodak 616 Art Deco with 110mm Voigtlander lens converted to 24x108mm format. I finish two rolls of film and try to scan but not finish yet. Minh<p><img src="http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8414/dscn1368ash5.jpg"><p><img src="http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/7341/dscn1369act4.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin carron Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Ralf, 105mm is about 'standard' on to 6x9. Normally the rough guide is that a 'standard' lens is the dimension of the diagonal on the film. The diagonal of 6x9 is 117mm but the frame is usually a bit smaller then the nominal size. Normal standard lengths for different formats are : 35 mm - 45 - 50mm 6x6 - 80-90mm 6x9 - 105mm 6x 4.5 - 75mm 9x12 - 135mm 4x5 inches - 150mm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jean_moxhet Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Hi, Here is a link to a "field-of-view calculator": http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/photos/angles.html A 6x9 with 105 lens is basicaly equivalent to a 24x36 with 44 lens (angle h/v: 45?/30? rounded). In your case with a format around 36x88, that give angle h/v: 45?/19? Have a nice day Jean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jean_moxhet Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Sorry, it seems that the "degree" sign was not recognized by the forum soft. So the "?" in my answer are there for "degree". Jean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene m Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 You guys are crazy. I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralf_j. Posted December 28, 2006 Author Share Posted December 28, 2006 Thanks for the input gents. Minh- that's a cool mod, what is the lens on that voigtlander? Do you have any resuls from it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene m Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Minh is the king of Frankencameras ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minhnguyen9113 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Thanks, Gene, you made my nose swollen. Ralf, here are some pictures of the first roll, I have not mask the view finder yet. <p> <img src="http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/7618/img102arr6.jpg"> <p> <img src="http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8084/img103aso8.jpg"> <p> <img src="http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/4589/img104ahn6.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_502260 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 I recently bought a 35mm Wide back for my Bronica ETR. It gives a format of 24X54mm. I tried a test roll but I may not have loaded it properly because afer the first few frames I could tell the film wasn't advancing properly. With the 50mm f/2.8 Zenzanon it gives a nice panoramic look. Eventually I will try this with a 40mm Zenzanon. I could just crop from center of a full 6X4.5 frame but there are certain films which are either no longer available in 120 size or were never made in that size. When I get the loading down I will try some of my remaining Kodachrome 25 with this back. To keep your 35mm film centered you could tape the back of the film to the backing paper. Then you would gently remove the tape when you take out the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukep Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Well, I'm about to do my first experiments with a Zeiss Ikon Nettar 6x9. But to do panoramas I wouldn't bother trying to run 35mm through it. I'll just crop the 120. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Luke, I'm with you. From the perspective of other posters in this thread, you're no fun. Neither am I. We're too interested in results, too little interested in process. Sorry, Dan By the way, on a Century Graphic with a 2x3 back (really 57 x 81 or so), shots with a 38/4.5 Biogon crop to 26 x 80 with no vignetting, somewhat higher or longer if a little darkness in the corners is tolerable. Now, that's interestingly wide. As you said, with a lens that covers the format shooting 120 film and cropping as desired is easy and avoids the "composing when shooting" problem at least one poster in this thread mentioned. Who needs an Alpa 12 or an X-Pan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now