a_tonkin Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 The Nikon blurb says that with D Series lenses the flash fires an imperceptible pre-exposure flash so that, along with the camera-subject distance information, the camera can guage the reflectance of the subject and so tweak the actual TTL exposure control. Presumably, a black or dark subject thereby getting less exposure than it might in a non D Series lens, for which the camera would continue to keep the flash lit so as to expose to the mystical 18% grey. All fine in principle, and for anyone with a Nikon camera / flash system, very very fine in practice too. But my question is that I like to use daylight fill flash with a polarising filter. The TTL exposure system can cope with the filter of course, but do people have any experience or comments on how the pre-flash copes with what is effectively a 1 or 2 stop ND filter? My logic suggests the preflash comes back to the camera 'weak' (because of the filter), the camera thinks the subject is darker than it truly is, and so the resultant TTL exposure is marginally underexposed ...? Still hopeful of finding anyone who actually runs this seemingly Mary Celeste-like website so I may change my registered email address Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 A ND filter only reduces the light: the flash does not include a ND filter factor, as a reduced amount of pre-flash is just that, allowing for more flash output to acquire the correct exposure. If the un-filtered light value requires f11 for the best exposure, a ND 2-stop filter would have the camera determine f5.6 to be the 'best' exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd peach seattle, washi Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Gerald, one of us is missing Tonkin's point (it may well be me...) At the point the pre-flash fires, the f-stop is already determined. The system does not 'know' the filter is there, so the flash doesn't 'know' this either. The flash can't change the f-stop (at this point in the evolution), it can only alter its 'burn time'. I think that Tonkin has a potentially valid concern, that throwing 'unknown' light modifiers into the path will mess with the calculations. It's a variation on 'second guessing the matrix' metering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_tonkin Posted October 6, 2013 Author Share Posted October 6, 2013 <p>I'd forgotten I'd asked this question and, now when wanting to search this site for any clues on the subject I found my own question comes up again. Any more answers?</p> Still hopeful of finding anyone who actually runs this seemingly Mary Celeste-like website so I may change my registered email address Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now