james_w.1 Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 My friend is a film maker, and was wondering what Ektachrome was like in terms of contrast and the general look although the film will be used for a motion picture film. (16mm) Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 Higher contrast than any negative stock, but not as high contrast as Kodachrome 40 was. Same stuff as Ektachrome Professional Tungsten films in 35mm. More natural colors than Kodachrome, probably less saturated. Grainier, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franklin_polk Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Ektachrome 64T and the now defunct 7240 news Ektachrome are certainly grainier than K40. Ektachrome 100D, however, definitly gives Kodachrome a run for its money in both graininess and sharpness, many samples I've seen certainly look as good or better than K40. As a suggestion, try asking at the cinematography.com or filmshooting.com forums, you'll probably get a larger response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar_njari Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 I assume he ment Ektachrome 100D (5285), thats the motion picture Ektachrome right now in 16mm. It's very similar to E100VS. Highly saturated colors, and strong contrast. I love its blue colors. Specially the color of the sky on a spring day. Really deep glowing blue, when underexposed a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now