Jump to content

M-6 Lens Carrier


james_kuhn

Recommended Posts

Hi, folks;

 

<p>

 

Does anyone have a strong opinion about the M-6 lens carrier attachment? At first blush it looks like a handy device; however, it also could very easily be one of those things you buy thinking, "this will make my life easier", and in reality, it just one more thing you never use taking up space in the bag. Any one actually using the device and your take on it is appreciated.

 

<p>

 

Thanks,

 

<p>

 

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks useful to me. The only problem is if you want to use a

tripod or chest pod etc. you have to remove it which is a pain. An

even nicer option in someways is the Benser base plate which carries

two lenses. You can get them s/h; I have seen a few on offer via

ebay. Of course if you want to use a Benser baseplate then you are

really stuck should you need to put it on a tripod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at it and all I could think is that the guy who invented it

never shoots vertical compositions. If you had a small 35mm

Summicron on the camera, and a 90mm Summicron on the holder, it would

almost be easier to hold the 90 than the camera body for a vertical.

 

<p>

 

I thought the Bug-eyes and the MR4 meters ruined the aesthetics, even

though they had actual functional uses, but this is a fix to a

problem that doesn't really exist. At least in my opinion. Extra

lens in a pocket or small bag equals a nice small camera... just like

Oscar envisioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al

 

<p>

 

I think that is the idea. Holding the lens on the spare mounting is

like a pistol grip. It would work less well with a small lens on it,

but equally then it can be ignored. Also you are free of the

inconvenience of having to worry about the lens M cap and putting

that on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I prefer a large inside coat pocket.

 

<p>

 

I've tried one but don't like it. It makes the whole set up heavy,

and sort of F5 like... If I'm willing to heft that much camera (and

it does make the M camera quite eye-catching and obtrusive), I'll get

a full featured Nikon.

 

<p>

 

OTOH, What is <i>very</i> useful is the little plastic ring that is

threaded with two lens mounts, and holds two lenses back-end to back-

end. Really tidies things up in a 3 lens set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mani

 

<p>

 

I agree with you about the back-to-back adaptors, but in my view the

M back to back adapters are inferior to the R versions since if you

leave one lens off the rear element of the other is exposed in the M-

version. In the R version this is not the case as the cylinder is not

open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the M back to back lens holder you have to be very careful

as some combinations result in damaged rear elements. The

best thing to do is just get two new style rear lens caps (deeper

than the older ones) and glue them together. Safe, secure and

handy.

 

<p>

 

The lens carrier is a marvellous accessory I have not figured out

a use for. I prefer to have bodies as lens holders (one camera,

one lens) even when I am shooting the same film in both

cameras. Everything is handy (hanging off my shoulders) and

ready to use: no fumbling. Alas this leaves me with no excuse for

my poor results!

 

<p>

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have used the Benser version which holds 2 lenses.On paper its great.Reality is different.It makes the Leica huge and ungainly.When you need to change film,the plate must first be removed.A small coin is reqd to turn the holding screw.The new Leica version is easier to remove but the fine balance of the camera is spoilt.Rather use the coupling adapter.I constructed a plate for my Pentax SLR and used extension rings to hold two lenses.Somehow it was better than the original Benser as I could remove and load film due to hinged back.I prefer a small bag and each lens protected.I still use ever-ready cases for one camera.I got used to it in Canada with the wet cold condition.I carried it under my coat,parka etc.Sadly its not my Leica.The new Leica camera cases are too big.The soft Benser bag is terrific.It fits most cameras and would be easy to construct.Its basically a pouch with holes for the strap and a zipper to close.When busy taking photos,the bag can be moved behind your neck.Great for poor weather.

That camera looks great 12 years old.Sadly its not my Leica....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I feel that the M6 lens carrier has it's moments. You will not want

to use it all the time for various reasons. I must say that it is a

neat little gadget that comes in handy from time-to-time. I find that

I use it when I photograph the National Seashore (Cape Cod) where

find myself walking thru miles and miles and miles of sand. No need

for more than 2 (or 3) lens out there. Great on those summer days

when you just want to grab your M , 2 lens, and GO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear James; let me tell you, as a carpenter, the leica lens carrier

attachment, as always been very helpfull, I don´t like it when

shooting, but as a hammer, with an Hektor 135 4.5, is a great tool,

but been serious I can tell that the most sensitive knok or presure

side of a M body is the base plate, I once droped my M3 and it hit

the floor with the corner of the baseplate that has the ear hole, and

the knok made the base plate open, yes, just like that, it was a fell

of about four feet to the cement floor, when I picked it up I shoot

it a couple of times and look carefuly until I found the base plate

was out, so any thing that can hang from it doesn´t seem such a good

idea to me, may be as a hammer.

R. Watson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, I'm obviously a bit late to chime in on nthis little number,

but why let that stop me!

 

<p>

 

This accessory looks like the most ridiculous waste of time

imaginable! What do you do when you want to change film? I suppose if

you never shoot more than one roll a day it might be useful, but in

real use (ten rolls a day, say) it would just be a major pain!

 

<p>

 

Strong enough for you?

 

<p>

 

Rob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...