travis1 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5100760-md.jpg"></a> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5100748-md.jpg"></a> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5100739-md.jpg"></a> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5100732-md.jpg"></a> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5100799-md.jpg"></a> d50 sigma 30/1.4 1600--------------------------- let's compare the tonalities (yes albeit on screen). Post your film or digital shots at low light high iso. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grg Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 <center><img src="http://static.flickr.com/97/274760450_16afc8ac9e_o.jpg" width=600><p>F30 @ ISO 3200</center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grg Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 <center><img src="http://static.flickr.com/98/226474895_f172fa05ca_o.jpg" width=600><p>F30 @ ISO 800</center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grg Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 <center><img src="http://static.flickr.com/113/268541915_3fed1cd78b_o.jpg" width=600><p>T400CN, M4@1/15, Hazy 50 Cron @2</center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-ray Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 I believe I shot this at 1250 with my old 1Ds and 85 1.2 at 1.2. It's been a few years and can't remember but I'm fairly certain it was iso 1250. My new 1DsII is even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shambrick007 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 <img src = http://www.yellowrhino.org/gallery/albums/Lolita-and-Rich/IMG_7579.jpg><p><img src = http://www.yellowrhino.org/gallery/albums/Lolita-and-Rich/IMG_7454.jpg> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirk van der herten Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 ?<center><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/10060303-md.jpg"></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeri leibovits Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Don, it's a grate and pleasant portrait, but it is more like 100 than a 1000 ISO.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny massey Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Travis, I've just got home (drunk) so I won't post my latest Neopan 1600, but I will say this - you have never posted anything so ugly as these (I am usually a fan of your stuff). Johnny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-ray Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 OOPS!!!! My error. Memory fails sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartMoxham Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Here is one Iso 1600 D70<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin m. Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 I'll state this flatly, then dive into my flame-proof bunker, but digital B&W simply can't be made to look like film. I don't care if it can resolve the hairs on a gnat's behind, and see in the dark beyond the range of human vision, it just doesn't have the "look" of B&W film.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travis1 Posted October 20, 2006 Author Share Posted October 20, 2006 some fine stuff! Sheldon, that 5d rocks. I like Gil's first but not really a fan of the F30's ergonomics. Johnny, no problem;). Kevin, yea the "look"...it's hard to describe but you know it when you see one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travis1 Posted October 20, 2006 Author Share Posted October 20, 2006 but'll i say this though. Digital has gotten so much better that shooting in low light is very "smooth" ;). YMMV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack_lo_..._t_o Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Kerosene lamp. Ancient (1971) pic, ancient (Rollei T) camera. Plus-X, I think.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoebox Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Delta 3200 @ 3200 in Xtol<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoebox Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 HP5+ @ 1600 in DDX<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoebox Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Tri-X @ 1600 in Diafine<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoebox Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Film rules! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travis1 Posted October 20, 2006 Author Share Posted October 20, 2006 <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5101953-md.jpg"></a> m4p summaron, triX. Ambient lighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Canon 1DsMKII 1/125th @ ISO 3200, Zeiss/Contax 85/1.4 @ f/1.4<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Strangest black and white I've ever seen. Maybe I've gone inverse color blind. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 So what about this one?<p> <center><img src="http://www.spirer.com/images/wiggy.jpg"><br><I>Wiggy, Copyright Jeff Spirer</i></center> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Canon 1DsMKII @ ISO 1000, Zeiss Contax 35/1.4 ( In the 11X14 print you can easily read the sheet music).<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Crap, my bad ... I didn't read the header post well enough ... Oh well ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now