justin_goeden Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Hey everyone can I see some shots of these two lenses shooting wide open? I would like to get one sometime, but prolly not both. From what I read both are highly regarded but I'm a visual person and I just wanna see what kinda shots we're talking about. My fastest lens was a 1.4 but it is a 50 and I wanna see some fast tele work. Thanks a million! Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincenzo_maielli Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Hi, dear friend. My brother it's an owner of both the FD 135 mm f/ 2 and FD Canon 100 mm f/ 2, both equipped with last version of the famous FD breech mount. The FD 135 mm f/ 2 it's a very good lens, both for optical and mechanical quality. However, i prefer the FD 100 mm f/ 2, a true optical jewel. The Canon FD 85 mm f/ 1,2 it's a fantastic lens, an optical and mechanical dream. Ciao Vincenzo Maielli Italy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin_goeden Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 The 100/2 eh? Alrighty haven't looked into that one! Anyone with some wide open pics with the 100/2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ari_kermaier Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Here's a picture shot with the FD 85mm f/1.2 L, shot at about f/2.8 or f/4 (I think) on Fuji NPS.<br><br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3760317-md.jpg"> <br><br> I'm very pleased with this lens. It's quite sharp, gives great color rendition, and can be used for extremely narrow DOF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin_goeden Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 wow that's extremely narrow for 2.8 or 4. very nice image. looks very sharp on the computer, i'm sure the print is tack sharp! thanks for the image! Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ari_kermaier Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 The DOF is so shallow at this aperture because the subject is only about 4 feet away -- close to minimum focusing distance for this lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirk_dom Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 I have the 85/1.2, the 100/2 and the 135/2. I'm sorry that I can't post any photo's but I have no scanner. I had the 100/2 first and made lots of shots at F2. It gives very good background blur. The 100/2 is also an extremely sharp and contrasty lens, maybe too sharp for portraits. It's also a small lens (Filter size 52mm) The 85/2 is just awesome. I almost always use it at F 1.2. The bokeh is unbelievable. Since I have this lens I stopped using the 100/2, even if the 85 weighs more than double. aesthetically, I think this is the most beautiful lens I have. The 135/2 is a very good lens. Mine is not as sharp as the 100/2. it's a very big lens which is expertly made. It gives a distinct tele perspective. Foreground subjects come distinctly loose from the background. I also have the 50/1.2 ASPHERICAL. A true gem, really sharp and very high colour saturation but in bokeh the 85/1.2 beats it. Since I have the 85/1.2 I almost don't use it any more, too. The 85/1.2 is something really special, and personally I wouldn't hesitate to choose it, if I had to choose between the 135/2 and the 85/1.2. Bye, Dirk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now