greg_moss2 Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 To those who have used both, is there a significant difference in the noise at, say ISO 1600 and 3200 between the two? I have the 1 D MkII and wonder if the "upgrade" would be worth it, but just in regards to ISO noise. I will probably wait until PMA to see what may come out of the Canon camp. Also, is there a significant difference in the focus speed in low light? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildpicture Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 It's basically the same camera with the very same sensor. I would not trade my 1DmkII for the N version. You only get a bigger LCD on the back (which I never use) and a slightly increased buffer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_rutledge Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 I have both, and there are alot more differences than just a bigger screen and buffer Hans, but I have yet to see a difference in high ISO noise. Both cameras are excellent! If you already own a non -N it's probably not worth the money you'll lose. But if you're a new buyer, I'd easily fork over an extra $500 for added features of the N. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_grobl Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Not sure about noise differences between the two, but Canoin suggests that the differences between the Mark II and the Mark IIN are the ability to change focusing screens, a larger LCD screen on back, and the ability to see ISO changes within the viewfinder. Those features are nice but probably not worth upgrading if you already own a Mark II. The one issue that you might want to consider is that some Mark II cameras had a problem with the shutters breaking...mine broke while on assignment in Sri Lanka, my full write up along with photos is here http://karlgrobl.com/EquipmentReviews/BrokenShutter.htm Canon fixed it for me no-charge when I got back to California but it was quite an inconvenience to have the camera fail while working overseas. The Canon Mark II is a fantastic piece of machinerey, personally I see no need to upgrade to the N at this time. Good luck with your decision, Karl<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_moss2 Posted January 26, 2006 Author Share Posted January 26, 2006 Thanks for your answers. Loved your site Karl. I've had the 1 D MkII since it came out and just thought about upgrading. (New camera twitch!) But I'll just wait and see what Canon comes out with next! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now