marissa_c._boucher Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 After years of shooting JPG, we're starting to shoot RAW starting this year for all our wedding and portrait work. With that said, in the past we would deliver negatives to clients in JPG format on a DVD. Some of those images fully processed, some not. Now that we're shooting RAW, I'm looking to find the quickest, easiest way to deliver negatives on disc so that they are at least in a printable, viewable format. My question is this, for the images that were never ordered for use in the album or as an enlargement (meaning still in RAW format, untouched), is there a batch process that I can run in PSCS2 that will convert the remaining RAWs & TIFFs into JPGs so I don't have to open up every unordered image individually to manually convert them myself? Also, should I run a batch process that changes the dpi of all images to 300dpi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Adobe Raw Converter in PSCS2 lets you set the file size, PPI, and file format when Saving. Just select all the images in batches your computer RAM can handle, set the size and file format and hit save to send to a desktop file. Look at the Tutorial that came with your PSCS2 to see how to set all of these. They are all right on the browser page when you open a file full of images in ARC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenseay Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 To convert the whole folder, go to File > Scripts > Image Processor. Very easy to do! I actually convert the whole folder to JPG. Then, I edit the ones that I need to, opening the RAW file and making my changes, then saving over the JPGs I already converted (if that makes any sense). That way, I can easily upload my 'favorites' to the web in JPG format. Jen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdkirk Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 Why are you calling them "negatives?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon jacobson Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 <i>Why are you calling them "negatives?"</i> <p> Because it's perfectly acceptable to carry over traditional terminology into new technologies. <p> Today's phones do not have bells, but they still "ring." <p> Many (if not most) terms used in Photoshop are film darkroom terms. Even the DNG extension is "Digital Negative." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 Back in the old days of film, I used to call a positive image on film a "slide". I don't understand this calling a positive image a "negative" either. This somewhat implies that all people think that film cameras only use negative film. James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now