david_senesac Posted November 19, 2005 Share Posted November 19, 2005 Who else puts digital signatures on prints? I have found that some others do this also and am wondering are we just a few or is this now done my many? Years ago when I began using digital processes, it immediately occurred to me that adding a digitally generated signature to one of my fine art prints was a preferred way to generate signatures on my work versus traditional mat or print media signatures. And I always hated signing the media or mat because making a mistake is disgustingly fatal. Of course some people crank out their signatures rather smoothly time after time but since kindergarten that has always escaped me haha. So instead I add a muted signature to the least noticeble spot on the bottom or top border. Blend it in with PS hue/saturation controls so it does not stand out or detract from the image. And usually save the signature as a separate layer that I can delete or change later. ...Davidwww.davidsenesac.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_hromnak Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 This is off topic but as a purchaser of art I would not like the signature as part of the print. If it was just a picture and it was sold by bulk than it would be alright. If it was a limited edition fine art print I would only accept an authentic signature. Just my opinion. Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr._smith Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Ed's right. A digital signature just cheapens the print. Unless you want to sell your prints real cheap! And it's not an accepted way to sign a print on the art show circuit. But the final decision is yours and yours alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_senesac Posted November 20, 2005 Author Share Posted November 20, 2005 Mr Smith there are certainly some among buyers of fine are who may share your opinion, "Unless you want to sell your prints real cheap!", but I've chosen not to share that view as too important. And of course I was aware some might think so when I began using digital signatures. You may be surprised by some of the pros that are already doing so. In fact galleries representing deceased photographers are sometimes adding a digital signature because a real one is of course impossible. In my own case I don't at this point sell matted or framed prints. So cannot in any case pencil up the mat. And that of course grates against those who think lack of even a mat is "unprofessional". Ahh but now quite a few other pros are doing that too. Yes and a few prints are being sent directly from labs to galleries without the need to ship a print to the photographer in the process. Also to sign atop a print has always been controversial, especially for scenic landscapes. Personally I hate doing that because one can easily muck it up. In my own case I have few qualms about going against the grain of those who cling to traditional accepted methods of presentation and framing. And in any case, will happpilly agree to sign a print if a buyer asked. ...David www.davidsenesac.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now