Jump to content

Assignment 2 (Version 2)--Basic Outdoor Fill Flash


picturesque

Recommended Posts

Maybe an other side story to promote better understanding of how flash works?

 

TITLE: "What's distance got to do with it?"

 

First a little factoid: When you vary flash power like increase it or lower it, you are doing

neither. You are increasing or decreasing the duration of how long it stays on. The amount

of light is constant. BTW, this is why flash retains a constant color temperature whether

weak or powerful ... it the same level of light every time.

 

It's all so fast that you can't see it except the visual perception that there is more or less

light coming from the flash. So, a flash can be 1/800th in duration when delivering it's

maximum ... or 1/2500th of a second at it's minimum. Think of it like you would a shutter

speed. BTW, this is why the shutter speed on the camera has no effect on light intensity

from a flash. The sync speed of the camera is much lower than the flash duration.

 

What DOES effect light intensity is distance.

 

There is actually a formula to explain it but it just confuses some people. The fact we need

to know is as light travels it's intensity lessens. That's why you have to pay attention to

distance when using Manual flash.

 

So, if you get the correct distance to subject set on the flash, the light falls off as it travels

on further out to the background. That's why backgrounds in a dark room stay dark.

 

But you can increase the amount of ambient light in the background by leaving the

camera's shutter opened longer ... known as "dragging the shutter". It has little effect on

the foreground flash subject because shutter speed doesn't effect flash (remember?)

 

To illustrate the effect distance has on flash, I once saw some tourists on the observation

deck of the Empire State building trying to shoot NYC with their P&S and flash at night. : -)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dolly--for the purposes of this assignment, don't put the diffuser on the flash--use the flash head straight ahead with no modifiers over it. Diffusers cut the power of a flash (how far it can go)--hence the distance change, and yes, these flashes are smart, but you have to be smarter to use them to their fullest potential. The distance goes away when you tilt the flash head up because tilting (and swiveling) assumes that you are bouncing the flash off a surface, and the flash has no way of knowing how far away the surface is--plus the fact that when you bounce, the beam of light has to go to a surface, bounce off the surface and go to your subject--no way for the flash to know this.

 

Unfortunately, you can't do this assignment indoors (actually you theoretically can but it isn't the best situation for you to learn about fill flash outdoors) so wait for a better day--this assignment goes til the end of the month, so you have time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Nadine. I understood the reason for the ND filter, just didn't understand compensating for it with flash. Learning photography in this day and age, you don't always have to learn things before you do them. Your camera already knows how to do it! LOL! I'll work a little more with the exposures like you mentioned. (Yes, that beauty is my daughter!)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nadine, we are getting rain here, so as soon as the sun returns I will actually do the outdoor fill assignment - samples are coming, I promise! Maybe I should try increasing dynamic range on a dull day (biting off more than I can chew I imagine!).

 

Thanks for the volumns of info you all have posted here already!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Michael--didn't see your post. Actually you can increase the dynamic range on a dull day with a flash. You set the camera to underexpose the ambient light, then use just enough flash to create the key light on your subject--the "just enough" part is the hard part with digital--you start at about 2 stops below "normal" and increase until you get just that little bit of key lighting on the skin, but that is a different thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael--yes, but remember you cutting the light getting into your lens, "playing a trick" on your film/digital sensor, but your flash doesn't know this (is out of the loop) so you use the flash as if you hadn't put the ND filter on. So in the example used, with the 2 stop ND filter on, you use an aperture of f5.6 instead of f11, but you use the flash as if using f11 as your camera aperture, meaning, for a one stop less fill, you need f8 light for your subject. Gets really confusing with manual flash--even with auto thyristor. Any through the lens system won't get confused though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info on the flash Nadine and Dolly. I'll get that changed.

 

I actually got to use some newly learned techniques today! I was an event photographer for the kickoff of an event called the Million Step Challenge. I had to take pictures of the days happenings. The registration was under a canopy. I metered outside the canopy, and used my flash on TTL-BL. I didn't have time to try manual. I was all over the place. I was just proud I tried this new technique. Before I would have metered for under the canopy, and blown out the background. This is straight from the camera, just resized JPEG.<div>00GK85-29830184.jpg.8da31662307819a35b8d71d6f8a24094.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Nadine/Marc/Ben and others, you rock.

 

Seriously, I am so impressed with your willingness to take so much time in teaching this essential part of wedding work. Such a lot to read and so much detail. Great information, really. I don't remember 'getting it' as regards fill flash, but reading this thread has me thinking it will save some people months if not years of learning.

 

Kudos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have a shot to offer today, using some of the discussion and advice here you can play and generally get pleasing results using the CWA method in cam. At least that is my finding. I think the camera (from my various tests) takes the center 20% of the image and applies 80% of its calculations from it. In this case it worked because I framed the white/black evenly to get the cameras meter to balance. This is a quick and reasonably decent way to get your light balanced for this kind of shot. I used less -comp on the flash, due to using it with a diffuser which takes about 2/3's of a stop from the flash output.

 

I set my camera to Manual (before i began shooting in this area I took a quick reading and knew I wanted 1/200th and F10 for the backlight situation) and used center weighted average for the metering type.

 

Shot with the 580ex dialed down -1/3 with the LSPJ pointed straight ahead (sometimes I will do -1 using the dome if the backlight is not so drastic/strong). Here is the result:<div>00GLYr-29870184.jpg.92435d253f9ce6dec50fb64fb4ae2b95.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny, when shooting this past Saturday's wedding, I was faced with a no-shade sun

drenched garden pics the Bride wanted. I thought of this assignment as I shot 2 dozen

various shots all requiring everything posted in this thread ... and then some.

 

It actually made it easier to accomplish because all of this information was fresh in my

mind.

 

Anyone can benefit from going over the basics.

 

I posted this pic on Lauren's recent post: No shade anywhere to be found. Turned the

Bride 3/4 back to sun, and applied fill flash.<div>00GLlk-29875684.jpg.71953e7db619b88dc2a9d264b5b302c1.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beautiful Marc! Yes, another thread would help those like me who are still trying to read this one. Although for many people's results, more discussion is required and thus is still "learning" info posted so maybe it would be confusing?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"in camera pop-up flash used for fill : -)" Marc, you crack me up. You can make a beautiful portrait out of anything!

 

All kidding aside, these are beautiful. The second one looks a little more shaded than the first. Was it? Or possibly a cloud?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...