david_kelly1 Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Nikon FM, late production, bought on closeout when the FM2 appeared circa 1982. Replaced the seals as a precaution when the camera became old enough to vote. Meter and shutter still perfect. I use it with the light, plastic, disposable 50mm 1.8 nikkor AF and the almost disposable 24mm 2.8 AF, both fitted with Lutz's ten-cent cable tie focusing tabs for one-handing.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpolaski Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 I have a Kodak Retina II and a Retina IIa. Unfolded, they sport 50/f2.0 Schneider lenses. Folded, they fit in my hip pocket and are excellent for self defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtodrick Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Konica Big Mini. It's the only camera I have, that, as someone stated earlier, If I lost I'd really not care. Problem is, though it actually takes a reasonable photo (snap!?) it is so automatic that I don't enjoy using it, hence it sits in the cupboard. So if I loose or damage a camera it's going to probably be a Leica :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivor_quaggin Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Rollei 35. Dropped on pavement long ago and suffering a massive ding, but still capable of great pictures. Also a 111F, but now at Kindermann for CLA, thus maybe moving out of the beater class. Finally a Voigtlander Vito 111 folder with the great Ultron f2 lens. This one acquired used for sentimental reasons. I had one new in 1953, but sold it many years ago and regretted it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luther_berry Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 I admire C H Tso's casual disregard for financial expense. My photo gear is similar to his (R8 w/50, 90, 180, 280 and will add 80 soon) BUT they definitely are NOT considered beaters. I use them but also treat them very carefully as I do all my equipment. As a result, my gear lasts a long time. I still have a fully functional Nikon F2 Photomic that I bought over 30 years ago. Guess I don't really have any beaters in my photo gear. Good shooting! :-) LB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richie chishty Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Leicaflex SL with a 50mm Summicron lens. Bought the lot for $350 on EBAY! Everything works perfectly! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_chambers Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 I recently bought a Tessar lens Rolleiflex to keep under the front seat of my car. It cost $100, makes a great weapon if necessary and that big negative offers lots of information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 In the sense that I am not too concerned about whether they get beat up or stolen, all of my cameras are beaters. Just can't be bothered to worry about 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfie wang Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Leicaflex SL with a 50mm Summicron lens. Bought the lot for $350 on EBAY! Everything works perfectly! :-) <p> -- Muhammad Chishty (applemac97@aol.com), December 07, 2001. <p> Wow, I remember you :) I was bidding on the same Leicaflex SL and you won by 1-2 dollars over me on that same ebay auction :) I am happy that you enjoyed the SL. I opted for the R4 instead the week afterwards :) <p> Alfie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_bryant Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 M3 and 50mm f/2 Collapsible Canon Serenar. This isn't so much a "beater" (Why would you want to use an inferior camera?) as a "portable". Print film. No meter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mostly sports Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Rolleicord V, Yashica T-4, Nikon FE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iván Posted December 8, 2001 Share Posted December 8, 2001 Hi, Greg: <p> I'm afraid I don't really understand the "beater camera" concept. I know you explained it well but still there is no camera I could think of like "well used, but stays around do to it's long standing use, inability to die, and the lack of overall concern if it gets dinged or stolen" <p> If it had all the characteristis you explain I'd actually be concerned about it getting stolen and excercise all reasonable effort to avoid it from getting dinged or damaged in any way . . . <p> Now, based exclusively on the "well used, but stays around do to it's long standing use, inability to die" part of the concept, it would be my DS M3, I guess. But shure I wouldn't like it to be stolen . . . <p> Regards, Greg. <p> -Iván Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mostly sports Posted December 8, 2001 Share Posted December 8, 2001 I call them "beach cameras" instead of "beaters," and the idea is that you may have cameras which you wish to keep out of harm's way. Valuable as collectable, or just very valuable. But a friend says "let's go for a sail!" Capsizing in small sail boats is no big deal, especially if you like to ride on the edge. Might get some great shots, which camera do you take? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted December 8, 2001 Share Posted December 8, 2001 The best camera I ever had till I sold them all (Nikons) and got my TTL was the Nikonos III inclusive of underwater flash (each shot meant addition of a new bulb). The nicest thing I ever heard about this was that it remained the best Nikonos of all time, especially after the Nikonos IV appeared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rush Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 I am actually trying to find a so called beater camera. I use to carry my Nikon FM10 everywhere before it got stolen on a bus back from NY. Since then I either carry my Canon FT-QL or Rollieflex. The Rollei is my favorite when I have film, and I like to take it everywhere, and it has been good to me, but I am too scared of somthing happening to my favorite camera (not to mention it was given to me by my dad, and was is camera in HS, along with the Canon). I am thinking of mayby buying an old Exakta on E-Bay to carry around as they seem to go around $50, but I want to find somthing a little cheaper (I know, it doesn't get much less), and less antique so that I won't feel like I am carrying around a piece of history. It does not have to be an SLR, but I need to have adjustable apatures, F-stops, etc. Any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jose f. Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 My current walk around-and-not worry camera is a very experienced Nikon FM with a 35/2.5E, with a replacement value well short of US$200. The alternative is a CLE, if I'm not in a close-focus mood. The criteria are light and easy-to-handle. A Nikon FE and a 35/2 might be a good choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_c2 Posted March 26, 2004 Share Posted March 26, 2004 Around a year ago-- when the last post to this thread was made!! I sold a Mamiya C33 to a guy on Ebay. I didn't know it at the time, as I hadn't even shot with it (picked up on a lark), but it had quite a few things wrong with it. I said to myself, what the hell, I'll refund his money and he can keep the damn thing; he sounded like he could do some repairs on it, while I'd just hoist it back onto Ebay as a $10 parts camera. But he offered me a Canonet GIII QL-17 in return for his money and the C33; this was, he claimed, a beater to him, but it still functioned well. I said thanks, no thanks, no need. He told me to ask for it anytime. Fast forward to a month ago: I was saying to myself, I could use a beater that I could take down to Honduras when my wife-to-be and I go on our honeymoon in July. So, hey, I emailed the guy and asked if he still had the camera; he did! The meter underexposes, so you just have to set the ISO to a slower speed, but the speeds are good and the seals haven't gummed up yet. So, there's the beater! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now