keith_van_hulle1 Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 I'm not much of a digital P&S person. My dad has a Nikon and he was playing with resizing a simple snapshot in PSP. He said he was increasing size in 5% steps. Below is a crop he sent me. Seems to be a lot of 45 degree crosshatching of some type .Is this from the sensor in the Nikon or something he introduced in resizing? My guess is his workflow but since when does a father listen to a son?<div>[ATTACH=full]100470[/ATTACH]</div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith_van_hulle1 Posted August 20, 2005 Author Share Posted August 20, 2005 Sorry 'bout that. You'd think I know to check the size first.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 I place my bet on the workflow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewpgrant Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 I'd also guess the resizing. I read in a "Quick and Dirty Photoshop Tricks" type book once that you can get reasonably good results from enlarging in 10% increments (as opposed to 5%, or any other % for some reason), but I've never tried it and made it work for myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NetR Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 I too would suspect the workflow. By all means work in increments to get to the correct size, but once you have it, go back to the original and increase its size in one step. You get the possibility of error and funny artifacts every time you resize. And always save the original before resizing - you may have better software one day. Regards, Ross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acedigital Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 He might try starting with a TIFF file and then saving final to a JPG also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jespdj Posted August 21, 2005 Share Posted August 21, 2005 What part of the original photo did he crop - i.e., how large in pixels was the original part that he cropped? You can't ofcourse blow up a small crop indefinitely. It could also be excessive JPEG compression. What settings did he set the camera to? Did he load/re-save the image often with a low JPEG quality setting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericwarnke Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 I've seen it before... it's the sensor->jpeg conversion causing them. Resizing may exagerate the problem, but I would guess if you just did a basic resize they would be there too. If you had the RAW file you could reconvert with a better alogrithm, otherwise you just can't blow up to that size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now