Jump to content

Which formal do you like?


allen_d.

Recommended Posts

I started using a 550ex on a stand shooting thru a Halo umbrella,

but on the lcd the mixed lighting looked awful. On the computer it

looks ok now, could have used some fill light. Shot the rest with a

580ex on camera with a stofen gold diffuser to mix with ambient

light. Which look should I be shooting for? Please no comments on

the crotch grabbing, I will be on top of that next time.<div>00DPPq-25444784.jpg.bf0449bda84bd08fb00805c67482b78a.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been working on colouring the flash to balance ambient and flash. A problem I've found when the whole picture is balanced very heavily over to tungsten or whatever, correcting in RAW can make some colours, especially the reds, look somewhat other than natural. As faces have a lot of the red spectrum in them this can be pretty problematic if very subtle.

 

Canon advise that their chips are optimised for daylight and although you can use the raw converter to balance the picture, for optimum colour fidelity the lens should be filtered as well.

 

I have a specific hall where the lighting is a mix of flourecent and halogen, the walls and floor are a light brown which comes out a horrible orange on film/sensor when you use flash as your main light, i.e. the walls are lit by tungsten. I tried fitering the flash but encountered the problems above.

 

To answer your question the 2nd looks better though the first with a proper WB and brightening it up a bit would not look so far off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are all good.<br>

I didn't notice crotch grabbing, it looks good to me.<br>

But, if I have to pick one I like?<br>

It will be the first one.<br>

I'm not a big fan of the B&G being the smallest in the group shot.<br>

Also, I'm not a big fan of group shots where people stand in some kind of funky formation. Just not my style<br>

I have never assisted anyone nor did I take a lesson.<br>

I rely on my common sense and my own style, so take it for what it's worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen, I prefer the first one and I'm glad you're on top of the "crotch grabbing"("fig-leaf"pose). Just another thought on the bridal party formal. I like that you were going for the "A-Frame" or "pyramid" but you might consider bringing the B/G up front on the floor along with the kids but then flatten the distance between your front and last row. There used to be an old traditional rule that no one should be higher (taller) than the B/G, but by brining them front/center you keep the primary focus on them....this gives you an inverted pyramid something like: /v\ Hope this is helpful.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the white balance in here was crazy. It had tungsten lights, with blue stained glass windows all over at 2 in the afternoon, so there was quite a bit of blue throughout the rest of the church. I shot raw of course and white balanced manually. So what looks better now, accurate colors as far as the actual lighting of the room at the time of exposure (although that is heavily influenced by flash now), or accurate colors (whites) on the subject? Here's what the auto mode in ACR showed. The blue cast is probably pretty accurate now that I think about it from the stained glass.<div>00DPWp-25449384.jpg.eab1f5fd99cf13c937ff8c51781ddba2.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...