petrovski Posted July 4, 2005 Share Posted July 4, 2005 I am looking into getting a canon fd (for my canon ftb and f1) portrait lens, to add to my collection (28mm 2.8, 50mm 1.4 SSC). I need it to take street photography and portrait shots! So, that said, which lens should I buy? The 100mm f2.8 or the 135mm f2.5 SC? Do you recommend a different lens? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay ott Posted July 4, 2005 Share Posted July 4, 2005 For a long time I used the 135mm f/2.8. It's a great lens, but I switched to the 85mm f/1.8 mainly because it's lighter. I thought I'd miss the reach of the 135mm, but actually I've gotten used to the 85mm and now prefer it over the 135mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank granovski Posted July 4, 2005 Share Posted July 4, 2005 I prefer the 135mm over the 100 but I suggest going with the sharper and maybe faster lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GerrySiegel Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 The 85mm is a fine lens. It is not quite as sharp at large apertures ans the 100mm. Both are wonderfully compact. I would hate to choose,but if I had to it would be the 100mm I think...what a tough one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GerrySiegel Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 I think the 135mm might be a long FL jump from what you own now. Up to you ultimately. It is also a fine piece of glass,and it comes in an f2.0 model as I recall. A collection indeed,good time to buy em all...sell what doesnt work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niels_de_boissezon1 Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 A tough call. Basically they're very much alike - it pretty much depends on what your preferences are. Personnaly I would go for the wider, lighter and more compact 100/2.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pvp Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 They are assuredly NOT all alike! I have the 135mm f/2.5 SD lens, and IMHO it is the one you should try. This particular lens is the same optical design as the previous FL-mount version, and was among the earliest of the FD lenses. The 135/2.5 has a character that is quite different from either of the other FD 135's. It has a bit of uncorrected spherical aberration that gives it a really nice bokeh when used wide open. Stopped down, it is impressively sharp. Another nice, if somewhat dated, feature is the built-in sliding hood, so you never have to go digging nor worry about those stupid plastic thingies in the later FD hoods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengt_rehn Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 I have FD 100/2,8 SSC, FDn 100/2,8, FDn 135/3,5, FDn 135/2,0. In my opinion I find the 100mm lenses more allround. I think you should choose the focal length you think you would like most of the time, and then select a specific lens. The older FD lenses like SC and SSC will look great on your FTb and F1(old version). Personally I would not go for a SC version since the coating is worse ( I had bad experience with the SC 28/2,8). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petrovski Posted July 5, 2005 Author Share Posted July 5, 2005 THANKS ALL, I just bought a 135mm 2.5 S.C. on Adorama. I will try it out for a while then maybe go for the 100mm. So now that I have a 50, 28, 135mm lenses, and two bodies (ftb and t70)...whats next to buy to perfect the black and white photography tools? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay ott Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 Perhaps darkroom stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 (a) If you don't have one, a pro tripod with quick release. (b) Lens shades. © Good (i.e. B+W) filters in light yellow-green and orange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petrovski Posted July 6, 2005 Author Share Posted July 6, 2005 I am reluctant to buy a $500 tripod..i have one and it seems to do the job.. why a new one? Also, where can I buy cheaper b+w filters? Do you think a polarizer is a good idea..more important than, say, a red filter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now